Is REDD+ More of an Institutional Affair than a Market Process? The Concealed Social and Cultural Consequences of an Ongoing REDD+ Project in Kolo Hills, Tanzania

Abstract

The neo-liberal rationale behind REDD programs aims to create a market for common resources, with monetary payment incentives as the most important driver for conservation initiatives. In reality, however, the chain of implementation from UN to village, encompassing numerous processes of design, planning, and practices at distinct levels and contexts, is more institutional and political than economic. This research project follows the planning and implementation process of a REDD+ project in the Kolo Hills, Tanzania. The analysis showed that the project’s main objectives were poorly understood by the men and women of the target group, who interpreted it as yet another top-down postcolonial project. The target group’s interpretations also made them act in accordance with their own cultural rationality and logic of practice and not as the donors and project implementers had assumed. The project objectives of the payment system, consciousness awareness and engagement of the target population, thus, seem to have failed, despite the donors’ and implementers’ claim of success.

Does REDD+ have a chance? Implications from Pemba, Tanzania

“…Although there are reports of successful community engagement in some cases (e.g. Uisso et al, 2019), elsewhere disenfranchisement is emphasized (Bartholdson et al, 2019). More generally, REDD+ projects exist within a complicated web of NGOs, consultants, government agencies, businesses and international bodies.…”

Forest management and conservation under the REDD + initiative: community perspectives across an altitudinal gradient in the Rubeho Mountain Ecosystem in Tanzania

“…It concentrates on addressing climate change mitigation and adaptation under the principles of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes. PES schemes focus on providing tropical forest communities with financial incentives from compliance and/or voluntary markets to manage and conserve forests, which in turn provide ecosystem services including carbon enhancement (Robinson et al 2013;Dyngeland et al 2014;Kajembe et al 2015;Parrotta et al 2016;Bartholdson et al 2019;Ken et al 2020). In the context of Tanzania, since late 2008, REDD + has been promoted as a global initiative to manage and conserve forestlands, mitigate climate change and improve community's livelihoods.…”