2004
DOI: 10.5688/aj6805118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Scientific Paradigm Important for Pharmacy Education?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…39 What can be taken from this in addition to the above regarding transparent communication is the need to "meet halfway"; that is, for administrators to recognize disciplinary differences and provide them with rewards and recognition synonymous with their particular field and for members of pharmacy practice to continually strive to advance the level of consensus and scholarship in relation to their peers. 40,41 The greatest differences in perceptions across faculty on defining a star came from those at varying types of institutions, and this should not be surprising given those differing missions and what is likely rewarded at those institutions. 42 However, respondents from private and teaching-based institutions were less likely to agree that their chairs, dean, and institution engage in conscious attempts to retain star faculty.…”
Section: A J P Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 What can be taken from this in addition to the above regarding transparent communication is the need to "meet halfway"; that is, for administrators to recognize disciplinary differences and provide them with rewards and recognition synonymous with their particular field and for members of pharmacy practice to continually strive to advance the level of consensus and scholarship in relation to their peers. 40,41 The greatest differences in perceptions across faculty on defining a star came from those at varying types of institutions, and this should not be surprising given those differing missions and what is likely rewarded at those institutions. 42 However, respondents from private and teaching-based institutions were less likely to agree that their chairs, dean, and institution engage in conscious attempts to retain star faculty.…”
Section: A J P Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, responding faculty indicated that faculty within their respective departments were not necessarily in agreement on how decisions are made. Faculty may be increasingly concerned with what might be viewed as "top-down" or authoritative management styles in a setting that has traditionally been known as a bastion for collegiality and shared decision-making (36) or might simply be concerned about erosions in their autonomy. The results of this study corroborate a prior study demonstrating higher perceptions of consensus among faculty at public institutions (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biglan'ın (1973) sunduğu çerçevenin temel boyutları olan paradigmal gelişmeler ve bilginin pratik olarak uygulanmasının akademik disiplinlerin değerlendirilmesinde önemli olduğu, yapılan diğer bazı çalışmalarla (Bird vd., 2002;Whetten, 1989) da desteklenmektedir. Biglan"ın (1973) söz konusu modelinden doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak eğitim teknolojisi, bilgisayar bilimleri, eczacılık eğitimi ve gazetecilik gibi birçok çalışma alanının akademik disiplin olarak değerlendirilmesinde faydalanıldığı görülmektedir (Clark, 2006;Czemiewicz, 2008;Getz, 2002;Holmes ve Desselle, 2004). Benbasat ve Zmud (2003), bir akademik disiplinin varlığı ve pratikteki uygulamalarının kapsamıyla ilgili olarak, öncelikle bir disiplinin kurumsallaşmasının ve akreditasyon kuruluşları tarafından öneminin anlaşılması gerektiğini daha sonra ise bir alanın disiplin olarak kabul edilebilmesi açısından üniversitelerde söz konusu alanla ilgili eğitim programlarının olması gerektiğini ve son olarak da akademik disiplinler için profesyonel kuruluş veya toplulukların varlığına ihtiyaç duyulduğunu belirtmektedir.…”
Section: Tablo 1: Akademik Disiplin Olma öLçütleriunclassified