Is self-rated health a valid measure to use in social inequities and health research? Evidence from the PAPFAM women’s data in six Arab countries

Abstract

IntroductionSome evidence from high-income countries suggests that self-rated health (SRH) is not a consistent predictor of objective health across social groups, and that its use may lead to inaccurate estimates of the effects of inequities on health. Given increased interest in studying and monitoring social inequities in health worldwide, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the validity of SRH as a consistent measure of health across socioeconomic categories in six Arab countries.MethodsWe employed the PAPFAM population-based survey data on women from Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Lebanon, Syria, and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the strength of the association between fair/poor SRH and objective health (reporting at least one chronic condition), adjusting for available socio-demographic and health-related variables. Analyses were then stratified by two socioeconomic indicators: education and household economic status.ResultsThe association between SRH and objective health is strong in Algeria, Tunisia, Lebanon, Syria, and OPT, but weak in Morocco. The strength of the association between reporting fair/poor health and objective health was not moderated by education or household economic status in any of the six countries.ConclusionAs the SRH-objective health association does not vary across social categories, the use of the measure in social inequities in health research is justified. These results should not preclude the need to carry out other validation studies using longitudinal data on men and women, or the need to advocate for improving the quality of morbidity and mortality data in the Arab region.

Harsh parenting, physical health, and the protective role of positive parent-adolescent relationships

“…Self-assessed health is a frequently-used outcome in research on the social determinants of health (Abdulrahim & El Asmar, 2012; Mulvaney-Day et al, 2007; Rohrer et al, 2007) and was used in the current study. Adolescents reported on their physical health by answering the following: “How would you rate your overall physical health?” Response categories ranged from 0 = poor to 5 = excellent.…”

The AMEL study, a cross sectional population-based survey on aging and malnutrition in 1200 elderly Lebanese living in rural settings: protocol and sample characteristics

“…This measure has shown to be a reliable indicator for overall health status [27] in developed countries but also in most Arabic countries [28]. Comorbidities were recorded by asking participants if they suffered from chronic physician-diagnosed conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, etc.…”

Subjective Sleep Inadequacy and Self-rated Health among Homeless Adults

“…19,20 It is also one of the most frequently used health indicators in epidemiological studies. 21 In one study, participants who reported receiving less than 6 hours of sleep a night were at greater odds for poor/very poor selfrated health relative to those who received more than 6 hours of sleep a night. 22 Moreover, sleep inadequacy has been associated with poor self-rated health in both men and women of varying ages and race/ethnicities.…”