2014
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201350356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is “strain glass” a nanodomain frozen transition?

Abstract: Controversies on the "strain glass" concept are discussed in the present paper. Both ferroic glassy theory and traditional anelasticity theory can explain the "strain glassy behavior".However, due to the limited frequency range of internal friction measurements, it is difficult to distinguish whether "strain glass" is a nanodomain frozen transition or thermally activated process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, all of them have characteristic ferroic dynamics slowing down with decreasing temperature. Note that there are discussions in literature regarding whether the source of the strain disorder (i.e., nanoscale heterogeneities) at lower temperature in a “strain glass” state is due to dynamical arrest of thermally equilibrated strain disorder of higher temperature (“strain liquid”), or quenched-in diffusive disorder (chemical) from still higher temperatures252627, or both. For the Elinvar anomaly that we are concerned in the current study, it makes no difference whether the strain glass state is exactly the analog of liquid melt-quench produced structural glass or any other forms of “amorphization” that have not experienced the typical cooling-induced viscosity-increase liquid-glass transition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, all of them have characteristic ferroic dynamics slowing down with decreasing temperature. Note that there are discussions in literature regarding whether the source of the strain disorder (i.e., nanoscale heterogeneities) at lower temperature in a “strain glass” state is due to dynamical arrest of thermally equilibrated strain disorder of higher temperature (“strain liquid”), or quenched-in diffusive disorder (chemical) from still higher temperatures252627, or both. For the Elinvar anomaly that we are concerned in the current study, it makes no difference whether the strain glass state is exactly the analog of liquid melt-quench produced structural glass or any other forms of “amorphization” that have not experienced the typical cooling-induced viscosity-increase liquid-glass transition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point defects determine the behavior of structural changes in the pre-transformation region of temperature, preceding B2 R MT [50]. However, the role of point defects in the process of martensitic phase formation is still controversial [51]. There is an alternative view in determining the role of nesting features in the Fermi surface of TiNi in the process of martensitic phase formation [52].…”
Section: The Role Of Point Defects In Martensitic Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slowing down of the ferroic dynamics can also potentially lead to significant metastability, that is, a system ending up in a quite disordered ferroic state (A, defined as an 'amorphous' ferroic state, for example, the ferroic glass in Figure 1) that is relatively far from the theoretical optimum (X) (for example, long-range ordered domain structures), but the ferroic relaxation (ageing) would be sluggish when compared with the laboratory timescale such that one must reckon with A. There are discussions in the strain glass literature regarding whether the source of the ferroic disorder (also known as nanoscale heterogeneities) at lower temperatures in A is due to a dynamical arrest of the thermally equilibrated ferroic disorder of higher temperatures (strain liquid), or a quenchedin 'diffusive' disorder (chemical) from even higher temperatures [13][14][15] or both. For this study, however, the exact source of this ferroic disorder is irrelevant.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%