2015
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is supplementary feeding in gardens a driver of evolutionary change in a migratory bird species?

Abstract: Human activities are causing rapid environmental change at a global scale. Urbanization is responsible for some of the most extreme human-altered habitats and is a known driver of evolutionary change, but evidence and understanding of these processes is limited. Here, we investigate the potential underlying mechanisms contributing to the contemporary evolution of migration behaviour in the Eurasian blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla). Blackcaps from central Europe have been wintering in urban areas of Britain with i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
121
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, changes in migration patterns of some species such as the Eurasian blackcap have led to more enduring changes to community structure because birds are now present throughout the winter in the UK. This is a trend that has grown in blackcaps in the last 60 years and appears to be closely related to the increased availability of feeders in gardens (Plummer et al, 2015). We expect that urban bird communities will continue to be sensitive to anthropogenic feeding practices resulting in foods being available year-round.…”
Section: Does Feeding Inevitably Change Urban Bird Community Structure?mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, changes in migration patterns of some species such as the Eurasian blackcap have led to more enduring changes to community structure because birds are now present throughout the winter in the UK. This is a trend that has grown in blackcaps in the last 60 years and appears to be closely related to the increased availability of feeders in gardens (Plummer et al, 2015). We expect that urban bird communities will continue to be sensitive to anthropogenic feeding practices resulting in foods being available year-round.…”
Section: Does Feeding Inevitably Change Urban Bird Community Structure?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, even among the well-studied examples such as Eurasian blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla (Plummer et al, 2015) and white storks Ciconia ciconia (Massemin-Challet et al, 2006), it is difficult to disentangle various other potential influences such as the effects of climate change.…”
Section: Feeding and Dependencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the density of birds, in particular some passerine species and Feral Pigeons (Columba livia), is thought to increase with urban cover due to the association with higher food abundance (Blair 1996;Marzluff 2001;Tratalos et al 2007). Furthermore, the migratory behaviours of some species may be altered due to the increased consistency and abundance of food (Plummer et al 2015). Urban environments may also present some species with increased nesting habitat, including natural vegetation and artificial nest boxes (Harper et al 2005;Jokimäki et al 2016Jokimäki et al , 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although studies of bird-feeding impacts in urban habitats are rare, there is mounting evidence to confirm that garden bird feeding can be profoundly influential for urban-dwelling bird communities (Amrhein, 2014). For example, feeding can alter body condition, reproductive outputs, adult survival, disease dynamics, community assemblages, and migration (Robb et al, 2008;Jokimäki and Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, 2012;Galbraith et al, 2015Galbraith et al, , 2017Orros and Fellowes, 2015a;Plummer et al, 2015;Wilcoxen et al, 2015). The vast body of scientific literature on the influence of supplementary feeding on a wide range of species and non-urban habitats corroborates many of these findings (e.g., Boutin, 1990;Clout et al, 2002;Ilarri et al, 2008;Schoech, 2009;Ruffino et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%