2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the aquatic environment sufficiently protected from chemicals discharged with treated ballast water from vessels worldwide? – A decadal environmental perspective and risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uptake Water Discharge Water LB SB Control Water (2) Treated Water (3) Salinity (psu) M (1) : 28-34 B (1) : 10-20, F (1) Intestinal enterococci (CFU 100 mL −1 ) Measured --<100…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Uptake Water Discharge Water LB SB Control Water (2) Treated Water (3) Salinity (psu) M (1) : 28-34 B (1) : 10-20, F (1) Intestinal enterococci (CFU 100 mL −1 ) Measured --<100…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofouling and ballast water are major mechanisms in the movement of exotic species among ocean ecosystems. Global ballast water discharged from vessels engaged in international trade has been estimated to exceed 3.1 billion tons per year, involving in excess of 7000 organisms being transferred among regions, potentially adversely affecting the environment, human health, and the economy in receiving environments [1][2][3][4][5]. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) established the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ship's Ballast Water and Sediments (BWMC) in 2004, which aimed to minimize the movement of harmful organisms and pathogens via ballast water [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simulations assume that DBPs are transported out of the harbour, therefore providing a lower boundary of the environmental concentrations. Other studies like David et al (2018) that use a port-based model approach to calculate the predicted environmental concentration, estimate higher bromoform values (e.g. 0.3 μg L -1 ) due to the smaller areas considered and the missing air-sea exchange.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It will spread with many other DBPs in the marine environment once the ship discharges its ballast water. A recent risk assessment with the methodology of the Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection -Ballast Water Working Group (GESAMP-BWWG) showed, that this methodology does not fully account for the potential environmental risks (David et al, 2018).…”
Section: Ballast Water Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation