Is the current level of training in the use of equipment for prehospital radio communication sufficient? A cross-sectional study among prehospital physicians in Denmark

Abstract

BackgroundPhysicians working in prehospital care are expected to handle radio communication both within their own sector as well as with other divisions of the National Emergency Services. To date, no study has been conducted on the level of training received by physicians in the use of the equipment provided or on the level of competency acquired by physicians.MethodsIn order to investigate the self-assessed skill level acquired in the use of the TETRA (TErrestrial Trunked RAdio) authority radio for communication in a prehospital setting, a cross-sectional study was conducted by questionnaire circulated to all 454 physicians working in the Danish Emergency Medical Services.ResultsA lack of training was found among physicians working in prehospital care in Denmark in relation to the proper use of essential communication equipment. Prior to starting their first shift in a prehospital setting 38% of physicians reported having received no training in the use of the equipment, while 80% of physicians reported having received one1 hour of training or less. Among the majority of physicians their current level of training was sufficient for their everyday needs for prehospital communication but for 28% of physicians their current level of training was insufficient as they were unable to handle communication at this level.ConclusionAs the first study in its field, this study investigated the training received in the use of essential communication equipment among physicians working in prehospital care in Denmark. The study found that competency does not appear to have been prioritised as highly as other technical skills needed to function in these settings. For the majority of physicians their current level of training was sufficient for everyday use but for a substantial minority further training is required, especially if the redundancy of the prehospital system is to be preserved.

The Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on Speech Discrimination and Verbal Communication in the Operating Room and the Role of Audio Communication Devices

“…This may include routine use of "verbal priming of the radio device" such as producing a noise cue before delivery of important clinical information or improving head orientation. 36,37 Developing a future technological solution to this may be a more effective remedy. Future modifications of the existing…”

“…Participant comments as to the late “pickup” of DMTS (missing the start of a transmitted sentence) could be improved through radio communication training. This may include routine use of “verbal priming of the radio device” such as producing a noise cue before delivery of important clinical information or improving head orientation 36,37 …”

Communication in Sudden-Onset Major Incidents: Patterns and Challenges—Scoping Review

“…Similarly, the compatibility of communication systems between different authorities and sectors 70,71 may present a barrier to MI communication, for example, between military and civilian authorities related to secrecy and encryption. Simulation training in the use of radio communication has not been utilized extensively, 73 whereas simulations in prehospital trauma care 74 and ultrasound, 75,76 for example, are widely implemented with significantly improved performance after completing training. In the study by Holm, 72 implementation of a simulation is recommended for improvement of communication skills.…”

The Great Belt train accident: the emergency medical services response

“…Based on 450 interviews of police, fire & rescue, EMCC, and EMS personnel, it was evident that knowledge and experience were varying, and especially the EMS personnel and the EMCC personnel used SINE in a restricted manner that did not fully utilize the options and possibilities of the system. A study by Holm [25] among Danish prehospital physicians concluded that initial training in the use of communication devices had not been prioritized as highly as other technical skills, but found the training level to be sufficient for everyday use for the majority of users. For a substantial minority, however, further training was considered necessary.…”