2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the escape velocity in star clusters linked to extended star formation histories? Using NGC 7252: W3 as a test case

Abstract: The colour-magnitude diagrams of some intermediate-age clusters (1-2 Gyr) star clusters show unexpectedly broad main-sequence turnoffs, raising the possibility that these clusters have experienced more than one episode of star formation. Such a scenario predicts the existence of an extended main sequence turn off (eMSTO) only in clusters with escape velocities above a certain threshold (> 15 km s −1 ), which would allow them to retain or accrete gas that eventually would fuel a secondary extended starformation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4.1.2). This may seem unexpected, given that a recent study of the very massive cluster W3 (M ∼ 10 8 M ⊙ , age ∼ 600 Myr, effective radius r eff = 17.5 pc) in the merger remnant galaxy NGC 7252 did not find any evidence for an extended star formation history (Cabrera-Ziri et al 2016). We suggest that this paradox might be explained if the ability of clusters to accrete and/or retain gas within its potential well during the first few 10 8 yr after their creation has a significant dependence on its environment, as shown by Conroy & Spergel (2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…4.1.2). This may seem unexpected, given that a recent study of the very massive cluster W3 (M ∼ 10 8 M ⊙ , age ∼ 600 Myr, effective radius r eff = 17.5 pc) in the merger remnant galaxy NGC 7252 did not find any evidence for an extended star formation history (Cabrera-Ziri et al 2016). We suggest that this paradox might be explained if the ability of clusters to accrete and/or retain gas within its potential well during the first few 10 8 yr after their creation has a significant dependence on its environment, as shown by Conroy & Spergel (2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Such a scenario has been demonstrated to have several caveats. Among these, massive clusters should be forming stars for the first 10s to 100s Myr of their lives, while no clusters with ages of ∼ 10 Myr or older have been found to host current star formation events (Bastian et al 2013;Cabrera-Ziri et al 2016a). Additionally, there is a clear correlation between the inferred age spread and the age of the cluster, thus suggesting a stellar evolutionary effect is the cause (Niederhofer et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is that massive clusters should show onc 2015 RAS going star-formation for the first few hundred Myr of their lives, whereas no clusters with ages beyond 10 Myr have been found with active star-formation (Bastian et al 20132016a;Niederhofer et al 2015a). Moreover, In order to form a second generation of stars, clusters must be able to retain and/or accrete material from their surroundings (e.g., Conroy & Spergel 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%