2007
DOI: 10.3139/113.100335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the EU Ecolabel DID List a Useful Environmental Evaluation Tool for Detergent-like Consumer Products?

Abstract: For comparing the environmental relevance of household and personal care products, the Critical Dilution Volume (CDV) originally developed for the EU Ecolabel of detergents is an often used key criterion. The EU Ecolabel Detergents Ingredient Database (DID) is a publicly available information basis for derivation of product CDV by providing data on key descriptors for the environmental fate and effects of chemical substances used in consumer products. The alterations of the CDV-relevant descriptors in the revi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the simplicity of the approach also becomes one of its main drawbacks, as listed in Table 5. This leads to proportional high contributions from inorganic materials because of simplistic fate models or assumptions and from perfumes, preservatives, optical brighteners and dyes (conservative safety factors for extrapolating acute to chronic toxicity (Nitschke et al 2007)). Using total removal (instead of biodegradation only) in the fate model of CDV makes the CDV approach more relevant and consistent with USEtox, whilst keeping its benefit of simplicity.…”
Section: Conceptual Differences Between CDV and Usetoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the simplicity of the approach also becomes one of its main drawbacks, as listed in Table 5. This leads to proportional high contributions from inorganic materials because of simplistic fate models or assumptions and from perfumes, preservatives, optical brighteners and dyes (conservative safety factors for extrapolating acute to chronic toxicity (Nitschke et al 2007)). Using total removal (instead of biodegradation only) in the fate model of CDV makes the CDV approach more relevant and consistent with USEtox, whilst keeping its benefit of simplicity.…”
Section: Conceptual Differences Between CDV and Usetoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To comply with the EU Eco-label requirements, the CDVof a product must not exceed an arbitrarily defined maximum value, and therefore uses an additive approach of ecotoxicity (Eskeland and Svanes 2004). This type of CDV calculation based on a defined functional unit can be applied more widely to provide a simple screening level tool for comparative product evaluations (Nitschke et al 2007). For example, the Stiftung Warentest, a German consumer organization, compares detergents by use of the CDV approach.…”
Section: Development Of the Critical Dilution Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developmental trends in household chemistry indicate a growing interest in formulations based on natural raw materials [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. This can be explained in terms of the growing environmental awareness of consumers [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ] and various aspects of safety of use [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. As the result, the market is offering an increasing number of products which are entirely based on natural raw materials or have some content of natural additives, such as fragrance compositions [ 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%