Observing and Measuring Visual Double Stars
DOI: 10.1007/1-85233-860-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Sun a Double Star?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• 1). A recent observation by Argyle (2002) agrees with the wider separation obtained with PISCO. Although the orbit of Popovic and Olevic was published recently, the 863-yr period is based on observations from 1953 to 1993 which define an arc of only 5 • : it is therefore largely unconstrained.…”
Section: Comparison With Published Ephemeridessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…• 1). A recent observation by Argyle (2002) agrees with the wider separation obtained with PISCO. Although the orbit of Popovic and Olevic was published recently, the 863-yr period is based on observations from 1953 to 1993 which define an arc of only 5 • : it is therefore largely unconstrained.…”
Section: Comparison With Published Ephemeridessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…STF 2909, ADS 15971: It is a well-observed object with 1179 observations extending over nearly 230 yr. Independent observations with the Cambridge 8-inch refractor by RWA in 2005 (Argyle 2006) confirm the PISCO large residuals. Surprisingly, the old orbit published by Heintz (1984, with P = 760 yr) gives smaller angular residuals than that of Olevic & Cvetkovic (2004).…”
Section: Comparison With Published Ephemeridesmentioning
confidence: 77%