2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is the Xiaomi Mi Band 4 an Accuracy Tool for Measuring Health-Related Parameters in Adults and Older People? An Original Validation Study

Abstract: Background: The aim of this study was to analyse the validity and accuracy of the low-cost Xiaomi Mi Band 4 (MB4) fitness tracker in relation to step count and heart rate in free-living conditions. Methods: 46 participants join in this study (38.65 ± 14.36 years old). The MB4 was compared with a video recording in laboratory conditions, also with the Sense Wear and Firstbeat monitors in free-living conditions. Results: No significant differences were found in the number of steps in the laboratory protocol betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…HR measurement is the most common biological pain scale for children because of that it was used as the biological scale of the current study to enhance the accuracy of the subjective pain scale, thereby increasing the ability to describe the quality of the response to painful stimuli and allowing for a more comprehensive interpretation of the results [31,32]. To achieve this goal, a smartwatch was employed as the measuring tool due to its proven effectiveness in natural conditions [35]. Additionally, unlike the oximeter device used in the Attar & Baghdadi's study [8], the smartwatch does not hinder hand movement during play.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HR measurement is the most common biological pain scale for children because of that it was used as the biological scale of the current study to enhance the accuracy of the subjective pain scale, thereby increasing the ability to describe the quality of the response to painful stimuli and allowing for a more comprehensive interpretation of the results [31,32]. To achieve this goal, a smartwatch was employed as the measuring tool due to its proven effectiveness in natural conditions [35]. Additionally, unlike the oximeter device used in the Attar & Baghdadi's study [8], the smartwatch does not hinder hand movement during play.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensing device, Xiaomi MI Band 4 (Xiaomi Inc., Beijing, China), was selected based on its previously reported utility, price, and average data recording time [ 35 ]. This wearable device allowed real-time data collection, including physiological indicators such as heart rate, step count, and sleep hours (classifying light sleep and deep sleep) as indicators of physical activity and quality of sleep.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It collects sleep, heart rate, and daily step count data. The Mi Smart Band counts the number of steps via a 3-D accelerometer and a 3-D gyroscope, and HR is detected via a photoelectric sensor [29]. Participants wore the band over the course of the 12-week treatment.…”
Section: Mifit Smart Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding MiFit app compiled the data, though participants were asked not to look at the app throughout the study, unless instructed by study personnel to do so (for data syncing purposes). The Mi Smart Band has demonstrated sufficient reliability and validity in measuring step count [29,30] and heart rate [29] and high acceptability among respondents [31].…”
Section: Mifit Smart Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%