“…For instance, board independence, the existence of an audit committee, and the presence of accounting and banking professionals on the committee have been found to decrease the incidence of fraudulent activities (see Beasley, 1996;Dechow et al, 1996;Uzun et al, 2004). Denis et al (2006) show that option intensity in CEO remuneration encourages risk taking and induces fraud, while Erickson et al (2006) show that the exercise of executive options and sales of executive stocks are not significantly higher for fraudulent firms. External governance mechanisms such as investors, employees analysts, auditors, media, and regulators are relatively less examined in the literature.…”