2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.695583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a Dark Side to Incentive Compensation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
76
5
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
76
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the institutionalization of stock options may have other unintended effects. For example, the size of stock options has a very strong influence on the prevalence of earnings restatements (Efendi, Srivastava, & Swanson, 2004;Denis, Hanouna & Sarin, 2006).…”
Section: Executive Compensation Debates and Informal Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the institutionalization of stock options may have other unintended effects. For example, the size of stock options has a very strong influence on the prevalence of earnings restatements (Efendi, Srivastava, & Swanson, 2004;Denis, Hanouna & Sarin, 2006).…”
Section: Executive Compensation Debates and Informal Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, board independence, the existence of an audit committee, and the presence of accounting and banking professionals on the committee have been found to decrease the incidence of fraudulent activities (see Beasley, 1996;Dechow et al, 1996;Uzun et al, 2004). Denis et al (2006) show that option intensity in CEO remuneration encourages risk taking and induces fraud, while Erickson et al (2006) show that the exercise of executive options and sales of executive stocks are not significantly higher for fraudulent firms. External governance mechanisms such as investors, employees analysts, auditors, media, and regulators are relatively less examined in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergstresser and Philippon (2006) show that CEOs are more likely to manipulate reported earnings when granted high equity incentives. Denis et al (2006) Much of the earlier literature focused on CEOs' equity incentives. But several recent papers have analyzed the equity incentives granted to CFOs, and how they impact the likelihood of fraud.…”
Section: Previous Literature and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%