2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There a Role for Preoperative Chemoradiation in Esophageal Signet Ring Cell Adenocarcinomas?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that, although no information on surgical margins was available in this study, previous studies have shown that SRC has a higher R1/R2 resection rate, a higher number of positive lymph nodes, and is independently associated with a poorer prognosis (6,9,(11)(12)(13)22). Our study corroborates these findings and seems to be consistent with the early trend of SRC requiring surgery combined with adjuvant therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to note that, although no information on surgical margins was available in this study, previous studies have shown that SRC has a higher R1/R2 resection rate, a higher number of positive lymph nodes, and is independently associated with a poorer prognosis (6,9,(11)(12)(13)22). Our study corroborates these findings and seems to be consistent with the early trend of SRC requiring surgery combined with adjuvant therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A study that included patients with both SRC and mucinous histology suggested that preoperative chemoradiotherapy had a favorable outcome (18). Notably, the SRC type does not seem to respond significantly to neoadjuvant therapy (12)(13)(14), as 88.2% of patients with SRC showed minimal or no pathological response and only 27.8% were downstaged (10). However, other studies have shown that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has a better prognosis than neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with no statistically significant difference in complete response rates (9,11,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation