Is There a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Teaching Sociology? A Look at Papers from 1984 to 1999

The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning—Done by Sociologists: Let's Make That the Sociology of Higher Education

“…I have argued that the sociological imagination is the key to overcoming the tendency toward oversimplified input-andoutcomes or teaching-and-learning approaches to the study of higher education, but at present the sociological perspective is noticeably absent in the STL literature, even when the studies are conducted by sociologists (Baker 1985;Chin 2002). It does not have to be that way.…”

“…In particular, Baker (1985) and Chin (2002) established that STL is not informed by the sociology of education. They lament that fact, and I share their concern, but I am going to submit that it does not have to be that way.…”

Taking Stock of Management Education: A Comparison of Three Management Education Journals

“…For the RefViz portion of our analysis, a reduced data set was used to meet the conservative definition of peer-reviewed articles; this more conservative definition of scholarship furthers the cause of legitimizing pedagogy research (Chin, 2002). Exercises were included in the analysis because they are a peer-reviewed portion of JME.…”

SOTL, SHE, and the Evidence of an Incomplete Paradigm Shift. A Response to “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning—Done by Sociologists: Let's Make That the Sociology of Higher Education”

“…As in any emerging field, discussions about basic conceptualization continue. An example of this is the dialogue on how to define the scholarship of teaching (see, for example, Albers 2003, Chin 2002, and Lucal et al 2003. Also, different acronyms are used by *Please address all correspondence to the author at Southwestern University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, P.O.…”