Information Systems Outsourcing 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88851-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is There an “Information Technology Outsourcing Paradox”?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on case study research, Rouse (2009) concludes that this is mainly due to myopic management and opportunism. Similarly, Overby (2010) argues that innovation is expected but often not properly defined, and sometimes not recognized because traditional business metrics fail to properly measure innovation outcomes.…”
Section: Background Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on case study research, Rouse (2009) concludes that this is mainly due to myopic management and opportunism. Similarly, Overby (2010) argues that innovation is expected but often not properly defined, and sometimes not recognized because traditional business metrics fail to properly measure innovation outcomes.…”
Section: Background Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An IT outsourcing paradox persists in the literature: While a number of large scale firm-and industry-level studies find positive impacts on productivity in the short run (Ohnemus, 2007;Knittel and Stango, 2008;Han et al, forthcoming), client organizations often report to be dissatisfied in terms of long run strategic goals such as innovation (Miozzo and Grimshaw, 2005;Overby, 2007Overby, , 2010Bacheldor, 2010). Evidence from case-study research and insights from simulation models suggests that this is due to myopic management and opportunistic vendor behavior (Barthélemy, 2001;Rouse, 2009;Windrum et al, 2009). In contrast, there is a substantial body of work showing that firms benefit from linkages with related types of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) (Bessant and Rush, 1995;Antonelli, 1998;Muller and Zenker, 2001;Czarnitzki and Spielkamp, 2003;Howells, 2006;Tether and Tajar, 2008;Huang and Yu, 2011;Görg and Hanley, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This BPO success model draws upon concepts proposed by Rouse (2007) for cost savings, technical services quality and strategic issues, and incorporates the dimension of user satisfaction judged relative to expectations proposed by Seddon et al (2002). It is also consistent in high level terms with a 25‐point conceptual framework for ITO success (Cullen et al , 2008), the high level parameters of which are defined as financial, operational and strategic.…”
Section: Offshore Business Process Outsourcing: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, despite this widespread adoption there are performance issues, dissatisfaction and an apparent dichotomy as to why outsourcing is so prevalent, yet lacks empirical justification, and remains a largely unexplored puzzle (Jiang et al, 2006, Rouse, 2007. In this regard, outsourcing as a process, shares similar sub-optimal outcomes with other large scale changes, inter alias: Business Process Engineering (Holland and Kumar, 1995), Merger and Acquisitions (Cartwright and Cooper, 1993), the chronic problems of ERP implementations (Scarbrough et al, 2008) and even major failings in large scale project implementations (Bronte-Stewart, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where outcomes are reported most consist of predictions or are desires to reduce cost (Lacity et al, 2010), are derived from expectations, and not on any grounded analysis (Rouse, 2007). Alsudairi and Dwivedi (2010), in reviewing the outsourcing literature showed the dearth of research into environmental/contextual issues, whilst Busi and McIvor (2008) observed that there are key gaps in understanding and a need for more action research, processual and longitudinal studies focused on those processes and implementation practices underpinning success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%