2017
DOI: 10.36076/ppj.2017.260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Traumatic and Non-Traumatic Neck Pain Associated with Brain Alterations? – A Systematic Review

Abstract: Background: Chronic neck pain affects 50% – 85% of people who have experienced an acute episode. This transition and the persistence of chronic complaints are believed to be mediated by brain alterations among different central mechanisms. Objectives: This study aimed to systematically review and critically appraise the current existing evidence regarding structural and functional brain alterations in patients with whiplash associated disorders (WAD) and idiopathic neck pain (INP). Additionally, associations b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, CS is not a characteristic feature in CINP patients (Malfliet et al, ; Scott, Jull, & Sterling, ), and cognitive deficits are observed to a lesser extent compared with CWAD (Coppieters et al, ). A recent systematic review concerning brain alterations in WAD and INP, only found three studies investigating structural brain alterations exclusively in WAD (De Pauw, Coppieters, Meeus, Caeyenberghs, & Danneels, ), and one study reported altered GM volume in CWAD. However, alterations in cortical thickness and WM structure, and their association with cognitive deficits and CS, have never been investigated in patients with CWAD compared with CINP, which is a prominent research gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, CS is not a characteristic feature in CINP patients (Malfliet et al, ; Scott, Jull, & Sterling, ), and cognitive deficits are observed to a lesser extent compared with CWAD (Coppieters et al, ). A recent systematic review concerning brain alterations in WAD and INP, only found three studies investigating structural brain alterations exclusively in WAD (De Pauw, Coppieters, Meeus, Caeyenberghs, & Danneels, ), and one study reported altered GM volume in CWAD. However, alterations in cortical thickness and WM structure, and their association with cognitive deficits and CS, have never been investigated in patients with CWAD compared with CINP, which is a prominent research gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guide the selection of cortical regions of interest (ROIs) from the Desikan parcellation scheme (Desikan et al, ) and the selection of WM tracts/ROIs from the Mori atlas (Mori et al, ) (see Figure ) evidence was retrieved from our systematic review appraising the evidence for brain alterations in INP and WAD (De Pauw et al, ), based on previous studies in patients with chronic pain or mild TBI examining GM morphological alterations (Cagnie et al, ; Cauda et al, ; Coppieters et al, ; Govindarajan et al, ; Kregel et al, ; Wang et al, ), demonstrating WM structural alterations, and regarding studies exploring associations between cortical thickness or WM structure, and measures of cognition and pain (Baek et al, ; Borsook et al, ; Chen, Blankstein, Diamant, & Davis, ; Coppieters et al, ; DeSouza, Hodaie, & Davis, ; Erpelding, Moayedi, & Davis, ; Kim et al, ; Koenig et al, ; Kraus et al, ; Lieberman et al, ; Lin et al, ; Ly et al, ; Mori et al, ; Piche et al, ; Sarikcioglu, Ozsoy, & Unver, ; Schwedt & Chong, ; Todd & Lempert, ; Upadhyay et al, ). In addition, only regions demonstrated to be mainly involved in processing pain or cognition or the combination thereof could be selected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with previous systematic reviews (3,41), the 2005 classification system of the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement was used to rate the level of evidence of each study based on the study design and risk of bias assessment (Table 2). Afterwards, the studies were clustered according to the outcome measure and ethnic populations, and the strength of conclusion (ranging between 1 and 4) was determined for each of the clusters (Table 3).…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Assessment In Individual Studies and Quality Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides pain, individuals with CNP may present with a number of disturbances in physical function including reduced proprioception, neuromuscular impairments, and difficulties with head-eye movement control (De Pauw et al, 2017;Della Casa et al, 2014;Ischebeck et al, 2017). Furthermore, people with CNP may experience fear of movement, symptoms of dizziness, a decrease of physical activity, and usually complain of disability during performance of daily activities (Cheng et al, 2015;Soderlund et al, 2017;Sremakaew et al, 2018;Yalcinkaya et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%