2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16040596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Urban Household Emergency Preparedness Associated with Short-Term Impact Reduction after a Super Typhoon in Subtropical City?

Abstract: Climate change-related extreme events are increasing in frequency and severity. Understanding household emergency preparedness capacity in Health-Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (Health-EDRM) for at risk urban communities is limited. The main objective of the study is to explore the association among risk perception, household preparedness, and the self-reported short-term impacts of Typhoons for urban residents. A population-based, cross-sectional telephone survey using random digit-dialling was conduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As is shown in Figure 8 , the top five measures for active disaster response are: consolidation of doors, windows and outdoor facilities (94.4%), preparation for emergency supplies such as food and medicine (93.4%), avoidance of outside activity (89.2%), protection of personal wealth and vehicles ahead of time (88.7%), staying away from dangerous and low-lying areas (87.1%). In the previous study of Typhoon Mangkhut by Chan et al, similar conclusions were reached [ 26 ]. However, the number of people who choose to go out to a safe haven is the least, only 7.4%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As is shown in Figure 8 , the top five measures for active disaster response are: consolidation of doors, windows and outdoor facilities (94.4%), preparation for emergency supplies such as food and medicine (93.4%), avoidance of outside activity (89.2%), protection of personal wealth and vehicles ahead of time (88.7%), staying away from dangerous and low-lying areas (87.1%). In the previous study of Typhoon Mangkhut by Chan et al, similar conclusions were reached [ 26 ]. However, the number of people who choose to go out to a safe haven is the least, only 7.4%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Certainly, planning and developing disaster risk management activities is facilitated by taking cognizance of the risk perception and preparedness levels and concerns of the target population [54]. Therefore, for more adaptive and resilience schemes for disaster management, the Saudi Civil Defense in collaboration with the Presidency of Meteorology and Environment, the Ministry of Health and educational institutions need to focus more on educating the public about disaster risks and encourage positive behaviors for dealing with their impacts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, cities and/or countries should continue to explore the relationship between local vulnerability and climate change disasters. Chan et al ( 2019 ) and the findings of this study indicate the cross-sectional nature of the research makes the research inferences limited to correlation relationships, not causal relationships (Alshehri et al 2016 ). Long-term follow-up studies are needed to address trends and changes in community perceptions and behavior, which is important to ensure relevant, appropriate, and effective family protection measures are in place to cope with future extreme weather events.…”
Section: Conclusion and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Restated, it may be valuable to understand how personal characteristics affect place attachment (van Veelen and Haggett 2017 ). People’s risk perceptions, attitudes, and responsive behavior are affected by individual attributes and demographic factors, such as age, education (AlQahtany and Abubakar 2020 ; Chan et al 2019 ), income and location (Alshehri et al 2016 ; Chan et al 2019 ), disaster types, and previous experiences of floods, landslides, and earthquakes (Ho et al, 2008 ; Grothmann and Reusswig 2006 ). Insufficient absorption of risk knowledge by the elderly, traditional myths, or differences in risk and anxiety caused by the disaster experience of the elderly may make age a cause of influence on preventive behavior and attitudes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%