1996
DOI: 10.1016/0967-2109(95)00078-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ischaemia of the hand after radial artery monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although multiple adult studies have demonstrated abnormal arterial flow or occlusion after removal of arterial catheters, the frequency of ischemic damage in those studies was extremely low (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although multiple adult studies have demonstrated abnormal arterial flow or occlusion after removal of arterial catheters, the frequency of ischemic damage in those studies was extremely low (4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a prospective study of 40 patients, 27.5% developed abnormal radial artery flow, and 10% had absent pulses after radial artery catheterization, but none had symptoms or signs of ischemia [4]. Hoencamp et al found that Doppler ultrasound showed a decrease in arterial function at one and 5 days after arterial catheter removal that resolved within 30 days [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reported complications include infection, bleeding, hematoma, and vascular events such as vessel injury with resultant vasospasm, thrombosis, thromboembolism, and pseudoaneurysm formation [1,2]. When severe, vascular compromise may lead to tissue ischemia and necrosis [1,[3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After cannulation, 27.5% of patients develop abnormal radial artery flows, with 10% having absent pulses but none having any symptoms of hand ischemia. 20 Slogoff et al 7 prospectively examined radial artery flow after decannulation by Doppler in 1,699 patients and found partial or complete radial artery occlusion after decannulation in >25% of patients. However, no ischemic damage or disability of the hand occurred in any patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%