Islam and Foreign Policy: Turkey’s Ambivalent Religious Soft Power in the Authoritarian Turn

Abstract

Although the pro-democracy agenda of Turkey’s Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi, AKP) gained significant domestic and international credibility throughout the early 2000s, the party has, since approximately 2010, experienced a dramatic process of democratic decline. The AKP has intensively used Islamist policies at home and abroad to consolidate its base of support under the leadership of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Weaponised in foreign policy, Islam has become both an instrument and an objective of the repressive AKP, and Turkey has emerged as a front runner in a race among countries increasingly using religion as a foreign policy tool. This new role for Turkey has created a slew of disparate perceptions among foreign countries. While some are content with Turkey’s religiously fuelled policies and designate Turkey as an influential actor which can use Islam as a soft power tool, others refuse to define Turkey’s policies within the boundaries of soft power due to its extra-territorial authoritarian practices. This study defines Turkey’s Islamic soft power as ambivalent and scrutinises the reasons behind this ambiguity by exploring examples from other countries in South-eastern and Western Europe.

A spiritual call: the courses of action taken by individuals influenced by religious soft power

“…Köse et al (2016) assessed the soft power of Turkey, Iran, and Saudi Arabia among Middle Eastern populations; Ciftci and Tezcür (2016) conducted a similar analysis on the soft power of these states among Egyptians and Iranians; Al-Filali and Gallarotti (2012) focused on the soft power of Saudi Arabia; Roberts (2019) reflected on Qatar's "Islamic soft power." In Jödicke's (2017) edited book the religious soft power influences of Russia, Turkey, Iran, and the European Union in the Caucasus were further investigated; Solik and Baar (2019) have argued that Russia uses the soft power of the Orthodox Church to maintain its influence in the post-Soviet area; Henne (2019) argued that although commonly neglected, the United States has a religious soft power that is "persisted and even expanded"; Ozturk (2021) shed light on the many ways Turkey uses religion in its foreign policy including in the form of soft power; and Ganguly (2020) investigated India's use of religious soft power in its diplomatic relations.…”

Dialectics of Tradition and Modernity in the Architectural Landscape of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

“…This interpretation of Islam has always been associated with groups such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS, both of which aim to establish a strict Islamic government and implement Sharia law (Weeks & Weeks, 2020;Burke, 2021). Radical Islam is minimally theorized and always defined as a scholarly category, and is used to label Islam and Muslim actors as "radical" without being interrogated as a specific scholarly practice (Ozturk, 2021;Thibault, 2022).…”

The United Arab Emirates’ Religious Soft Power through Ulema and Organizations

“…The soft power aspect of religion is also problematic in terms of drawing a line between its soft and hard sides. Therefore, the use of religion in power is not always straightforward and may have an ambiguous status if it eases the state's use of hard power and authoritarianism (Ozturk 2021). The UAE's relationship with religion is also similar to Ozturk's definition of ambiguity.…”