“…Archipelagic thinking, a relational mode actively promoted by many island studies scholars (see e.g. Martínez-San Miguel & Stephens, 2020;Xie et al, 2020;Baldacchino, 2016;Pugh, 2013;Stratford, 2013;Stratford et al, 2011;Fletcher, 2011;DeLoughrey, 2007DeLoughrey, , 2004DeLoughrey, , 2001Hau'ofa, 1994;Gilroy, 1993), foregrounds the fluidity, diversity, and dynamic state of the archipelago, thereby disrupting binarism, dichotomies, and the static form. It stresses "a respect for otherness that stands in stark opposition to the conceptual tyranny of Western thought" (Poiana, 2008, p. 174) and implies "an awareness of the collectivity and interconnectivity of other islands in the archipelago (and hence other subjects in society), which become the nodes of constant movement and exchange, both geographically and culturally" (Ashcroft, 2017, p. 148).…”