2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijlsm.2016.077281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach for analysis of GSCM enablers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often, the variables have weak to extremely strong relationships amongst themselves, which is ignored in MICMAC. Therefore to address the relationships more accurately, Fuzzy-MICMAC was introduced, where the relationships between the variables are identified qualitatively on a scale of 0-1, as stated in Table 8 (Dube and Gawande, 2016;Jain and Raj, 2015;Mohanty, 2018).…”
Section: Fuzzy-matriced Impact Cruises Multiplication Appliquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, the variables have weak to extremely strong relationships amongst themselves, which is ignored in MICMAC. Therefore to address the relationships more accurately, Fuzzy-MICMAC was introduced, where the relationships between the variables are identified qualitatively on a scale of 0-1, as stated in Table 8 (Dube and Gawande, 2016;Jain and Raj, 2015;Mohanty, 2018).…”
Section: Fuzzy-matriced Impact Cruises Multiplication Appliquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISM methodology proposes the use of the subject matter expert opinions based on various management techniques such as Interviews and brainstorming [161][162][163] to develop the contextual relationship between the variables. In this paper for identifying the contextual relationship among the barriers, 12 experts of whom 10 are from industry dealing with healthcare operations, Information Technology, operation management, and two from the academia having experience in research and development are identified through the author's professional and personal networks.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this version has a limitation: it only uses binary relationships to denote the association between every two variables. To overcome this limitation, several studies have adopted the fuzzy version of MICMAC analysis (see, for example, Bashir et al , 2020; Bhosale and Kant, 2016; Dube and Gawande, 2016).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the identification of CSFs, first, a preliminary list of 32 success factors for implementing sustainability practices in different sectors was collated based on recent studies (Alhamali, 2019; Dube and Gawande, 2016; Raut et al , 2017; Singh, 2017). Then, a panel of six experts was formed.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%