2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-57974-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ISOGO: Functional annotation of protein-coding splice variants

Abstract: the advent of RnA-seq technologies has switched the paradigm of genetic analysis from a genome to a transcriptome-based perspective. Alternative splicing generates functional diversity in genes, but the precise functions of many individual isoforms are yet to be elucidated. Gene Ontology was developed to annotate gene products according to their biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components. Despite a single gene may have several gene products, most annotations are not isoform-specific and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UPEFinder () along with NeXtProt, PHAROS, and literature curation were mainly used for the uPE1 protein search. , The structure and function prediction workflow of uPE1 were taken from HPSF (Human Proteome Structure and Function) and the associated literature. , In brief, the FASTA sequence of the particular uPE1 protein was downloaded, and a protein BLAST () was performed to screen homologous protein. The protein was also searched in ISOGO for extracting isoform information based on the prediction . Furthermore, the FASTA sequence was uploaded in i-TASSER followed by COFACTOR for structure and function prediction. , Lastly, the structure and function were selected from the output based on the TM score, RMSD for i-TASSER, and Cscore GO for COFACTOR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…UPEFinder () along with NeXtProt, PHAROS, and literature curation were mainly used for the uPE1 protein search. , The structure and function prediction workflow of uPE1 were taken from HPSF (Human Proteome Structure and Function) and the associated literature. , In brief, the FASTA sequence of the particular uPE1 protein was downloaded, and a protein BLAST () was performed to screen homologous protein. The protein was also searched in ISOGO for extracting isoform information based on the prediction . Furthermore, the FASTA sequence was uploaded in i-TASSER followed by COFACTOR for structure and function prediction. , Lastly, the structure and function were selected from the output based on the TM score, RMSD for i-TASSER, and Cscore GO for COFACTOR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein was also searched in ISOGO for extracting isoform information based on the prediction. 31 Furthermore, the FASTA sequence was uploaded in i-TASSER followed by COFACTOR for structure and function prediction. 32,33 Lastly, the structure and function were selected from the output based on the TM score, RMSD for i-TASSER, and Cscore GO for COFACTOR.…”
Section: Structure and Function Prediction Of Upe1 Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further make comprehensive comparisons between the functional prediction performance of FINER and that of several state-of-the-art methods with different objectives, including two recent isoform function prediction methods DIFFUSE ( 12 ) and DisoFun ( 14 ), a tissue-specific protein function prediction method OhmNet ( 20 ) and a general biological network refinement method NE ( 59 ). Note that three isoform function prediction methods, DisoFun, ISOGO ( 16 ) and IsoResolve ( 15 ) have been published in the literature after DIFFUSE. Although these methods have not been compared with DIFFUSE directly on the same dataset, their reported overall performance all seem to be worse than that of DIFFUSE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we find splicing is both frequent and significant, our tool provides an essential way to extend the functionality of these databases. Interestingly some people have started to work on transcript-level databases [44][45][46] , but there is still much to do.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%