ABSTRACT:In vivo growth fluorometry (Karsten et al. 1996) is based on the sensitive detection of in vivo chlorophyll a (chl a) fluorescence and monitors its increase over time as an indicator for growth. The method offers a simple, rapid, non-invasive, reproducible and calibration-free measurement of growth rates in unialgal cultures and facilitates multifactorial ecophysiological studies on algal cultures. The technical setup is well suited for use on benthic, adhering, filamentous and colonyforming microalgae. Low detection limits avoid self-shading and nutrient limitation during growth rate determination. Acclimated growth rates should be measured after a pre-incubation phase of 1 to 3 d. A broad data set correlating in vivo chl a fluorescence with cell number, organic carbon and chl a concentration in representative members of the Cyanobacteria, Rhodophyta, Chlorophyta and Bacillariophyceae is presented. A calibration of chl a fluorescence is not required for acclimated growth rate measurements of Bacillariophyceae and Chlorophyta but is recommended for high abundances of Cyanobacteria and Rhodophyta.KEY WORDS: Growth rate · Chlorophyll a fluorescence · Adhering algae · Multifactorial ecophysiological studies
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherAquat Microb Ecol 55: [95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104] 2009 ical) determination of abundance is often replaced by cellular biomass markers, such as chlorophyll a (chl a), carbon, ATP or proteins (Stein 1973, Butterwick et al. 1982, Becker 1994. Disadvantages of using these biomarkers are related to incomplete extraction procedures, calibration protocols and the specificity of the test methods (for discussion see Wright et al. 1997). Moreover, the absolute concentration of biomass parameters is influenced by abiotic parameters such as radiation or nutrient supply, and by culture age, physiology and size of cells (Kruskopf & Flynn 2006). In laboratory cultures these factors can be controlled, while respective data obtained in field studies must be evaluated by taking into account alterations in community structure and variation in abiotic parameters. Furthermore, the use of carbon or protein content as algal biomass equivalents is hampered by co-occurring bacteria or organic exudates.Growth of colonial or filamentous organisms can be determined gravimetrically as dry mass (e.g. GarciaPichel et al. 1992). Packed cell volume measurements offer a similar approach, as algal samples are centrifuged in scaled capillary tubes and their abundance is determined as biomass by volume. However, dry mass and packed cell volume include any contamination such as bacteria or suspended particles and, hence, falsify the results.The most widespread in vivo method in culture studies is the determination of absorbance (optical density) at a given wavelength. It is a simple and non-invasive method for measuring microbial abundance. Optical density is commonly defined as log 10 (I 0 /I t ), i.e. the logarithm to the base 10 of the ra...