2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this could be challenging during acetabular cup only revision or liner exchange, where the femoral stem is left in situ. [3,8] Furthermore, applying vigorous retraction on the femoral stem or direct contact of the trunnion with metal retractors could lead to scratches and damage to the femoral stem trunnion with subsequent failure due to trunnionosis. [9] Various techniques were used to protect the trunnion to avoid the previously mentioned drawbacks, mainly using a soft material to cover the trunnion, such as swabs, a rubber laryngeal mask, [5] and part of urine drainage Foley's catheter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this could be challenging during acetabular cup only revision or liner exchange, where the femoral stem is left in situ. [3,8] Furthermore, applying vigorous retraction on the femoral stem or direct contact of the trunnion with metal retractors could lead to scratches and damage to the femoral stem trunnion with subsequent failure due to trunnionosis. [9] Various techniques were used to protect the trunnion to avoid the previously mentioned drawbacks, mainly using a soft material to cover the trunnion, such as swabs, a rubber laryngeal mask, [5] and part of urine drainage Foley's catheter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolated acetabular cup revision with retention of the femoral stem constitutes a substantial number of revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) cases reaching up to 25% of all RTHA. [1][2][3][4] If a complete revision of the acetabular component or a liner exchange is planned, the femoral stem needs to be retracted to visualize the acetabulum better. During this procedure, the trunnion could be scratched or damaged by retractors or the instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT-based navigation and robotic-assisted surgery are representative tools; CT-based navigation has been reported to reduce the error of placement of the acetabular cup and to be useful for both primary and complicated THA procedures (dysplasia and revision THA). 1519 Robotic surgery has also been reported to improve cup implantation accuracy. 10,20,21 In addition to these 2 tools, 3D patient-specific guidance, preoperative 3D planning, augmented reality, and an accelerometer have been reported to be useful; 8,2226 however, a major initial investment and familiarity are necessary for their use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several observational studies have assessed the outcomes of isolated cup revision with a retained stem ( 9 11 ). Most researchers recommended that the selection criteria for patients who were about to undergo an isolated cup revision should be rigorous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%