1998
DOI: 10.1006/geno.1998.5329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and Characterization of Mouse Minisatellites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall frequency of such minisatellites in five mammalian genomes investigated at a significant scale is similar (Amarger et al 1998;Bois et al 1998;Georges et al 1991). The distribution is however very different, with a high bias toward chromosome ends in human and a much lower bias in mouse and rat.…”
Section: Taking Advantage Of the Global View Provided By Large-scale mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The overall frequency of such minisatellites in five mammalian genomes investigated at a significant scale is similar (Amarger et al 1998;Bois et al 1998;Georges et al 1991). The distribution is however very different, with a high bias toward chromosome ends in human and a much lower bias in mouse and rat.…”
Section: Taking Advantage Of the Global View Provided By Large-scale mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The use of minisatellites detected by DNA fingerprinting in these various species has been largely restricted to studies of population structure and mating patterns, conservation biology, genetic diversity and the development of genetic markers [99][100][101][102]. The systematic isolation of rat, mouse and pig minisatellites showed that authentic human-like minisatellites do exist in non-primate species [101,103,104], with 10 to 60 bp long GC-rich repeat units and the presence of variant repeat sequences interspersed along the repeat array. In humans, about 90% of minisatellites are localised in subtelomeric regions [103].…”
Section: Minisatellites In Non-human Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, expanded simple tandem repeat (ESTR) loci were initially categorised as minisatellites, owing to the possession of some similar characteristics. However, subsequent characterisation of the loci has determined that ESTR regions are currently located solely within the mouse genome and are separate to the less hypervariable true minisatellite loci encompassed within the mouse genome (Kelly et al, 1989;Gibbs et al, 1993;Bois et al, 1998aBois et al, , 1998b. As such, to date there is no animal model in which the mutation induction at minisatellites can be appropriately studied, nor is there any such equivalent for a human ESTR model at this time.…”
Section: Hypervariable Tandem Repeat Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extensively researched in humans (Jeffreys et al, 1985bJeffreys, 1987), DNA fingerprint analysis has shown that they are omnipresent throughout the genome of most organisms and higher eukaryotes (Burke & Bruford, 1987;Jeffreys et al, 1987;Gilbert et al, 1990;Andersen & Nilsson-Tillgren, 1997;Bois et al, 1998a). Shown to exhibit high levels of germline mutation rates (up to 15% per gamete) (Vergnaud et al, 1991), minisatellites have thus been successfully utilised as a tool for monitoring DNA mutation following exposure to environmental doses of mutagenic agents in both human (Dubrova et al, 1996(Dubrova et al, , 1997Kodaira et al, 1995Kodaira et al, , 2004Satoh et al, 1996;Livshits et al, 2001;Kiuru et al, 2003), and animal populations (Yauk & Quinn, 1996;Yauk et al, 2000).…”
Section: Minisatellitesmentioning
confidence: 99%