2016
DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2016.1385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation by sugar flotation has no direct effect on the hatching success of zooplankton resting eggs

Abstract: <p>Zooplankton in temporary waters produces resting stages to survive recurrent dry periods. Branchiopod crustaceans (i.e., cladocerans, large branchiopods) overcome these periods in the form of resting eggs buried in the sediment. Examining the diversity in the resting egg banks allows for a more accurate estimation of biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems than looking only at the active communities. The isolation of resting eggs from the sediment may be achieved by the sugar flotation method, which usuall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore sucrose flotation of Triops eggs used in the isolation hatching method had no effect upon hatching rates of resting eggs, as recently supported by Lukic, Vad & Horváth (2016). Our results from the hatching methods suggest that the Caerlaverock T. cancriformis populations exhibit a low level of bet-hedging.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Therefore sucrose flotation of Triops eggs used in the isolation hatching method had no effect upon hatching rates of resting eggs, as recently supported by Lukic, Vad & Horváth (2016). Our results from the hatching methods suggest that the Caerlaverock T. cancriformis populations exhibit a low level of bet-hedging.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This procedure, as stated by Lukić et al (2016), should have neither a negative nor positive effect on Daphnia hatching; thus, this difference in experimental procedures is unlikely to have affected the hatching rates in our research.…”
Section: Experimental and Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Anostracans can reach high densities in their habitats (Daborn, 1977;Horváth, Vad, Vörös, et al, 2013b;Vanschoenwinkel, Brendonck, Pinceel, Dupriez, & Waterkeyn, 2013; and they act both as competitors and predators of smaller zooplankton (Jocque, Vanschoenwinkel, & Brendonck, 2010;Lukić et al, 2018;Waterkeyn et al, 2011), which suggests a high impact on the zooplankton community. Even though B. orientalis hatches very early after inundation/ice break (Lukić, Vad, & Horváth, 2016;Petkovski, 1991), it is probably predominantly herbivorous in the early stages of its life (similar to other anostracans; Daborn, 1975;Fryer, 1983), which gives some time for zooplankton communities to establish at the beginning of the wet phase of their habitats. Moreover, anostracans disappear before temporary ponds dry out, while many zooplankton species occur throughout the whole wet season (Horváth, Vad, Vörös, et al, 2013a;Jocqué, Riddoch, & Brendonck, 2007;Tóth et al, 2014;Vanschoenwinkel, Waterkeyn, et al, 2010), which overall provides a temporal refuge for zooplankton (Kratina et al, 2012).…”
Section: Effect Of Anostracans On the Community As An Ig Predatormentioning
confidence: 99%