1981
DOI: 10.2307/3759602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation of Auxotrophic Mutants of Allomyces macrogynus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that Allo2 may be anisogamous; however, we have been unable to reproducibly induce the anisogamous hermaphroditic hyphae in the laboratory cultures of this strain. Further, the strain, Burma 3-35 was historically reported as being anisogamous (Olson and Nielsen 1981), but forms a well-supported clade in our analysis with the isogamous strain, Neo (Olson 1980) (Figure 1e, Figure 2, Figure S1). Burma 3-35 also shares most genes with the strain Neo (Figure 2a, Figure S2c) and has not shown anisogamous mating structures in laboratory cultures, even after repeated trials (data not shown).…”
Section: Figure 2 Evolution Of Anisogamy In Allomycesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…These results suggest that Allo2 may be anisogamous; however, we have been unable to reproducibly induce the anisogamous hermaphroditic hyphae in the laboratory cultures of this strain. Further, the strain, Burma 3-35 was historically reported as being anisogamous (Olson and Nielsen 1981), but forms a well-supported clade in our analysis with the isogamous strain, Neo (Olson 1980) (Figure 1e, Figure 2, Figure S1). Burma 3-35 also shares most genes with the strain Neo (Figure 2a, Figure S2c) and has not shown anisogamous mating structures in laboratory cultures, even after repeated trials (data not shown).…”
Section: Figure 2 Evolution Of Anisogamy In Allomycesmentioning
confidence: 53%