2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation, Screening and Optimization for Laccase production by Scytalidium lignicola pesante under submerged fermentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anti-MRSA activity declined slightly with further increment in inoculum sizes. Similar observation also reported by Sidhu et al, (2017) in which two mycelial discs was sufficient to stimulate higher laccase production by Scytalidium lignicola under submerged fermentation. Higher inoculum sizes than the optimal may stimulate too much production of microbial biomass which lead to nutrient depletion for their secondary metabolite production (Kumar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The anti-MRSA activity declined slightly with further increment in inoculum sizes. Similar observation also reported by Sidhu et al, (2017) in which two mycelial discs was sufficient to stimulate higher laccase production by Scytalidium lignicola under submerged fermentation. Higher inoculum sizes than the optimal may stimulate too much production of microbial biomass which lead to nutrient depletion for their secondary metabolite production (Kumar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In previous studies, similarly, Scytalidium lignicola pesante (Sidhu et al 2017) and Myrothecium verrucaria (Sun et al 2017), P. eryngii, P. florida and P. sajor caju (Mathur et al 2021), Beauveria pseudobassiana (Sharma et al 2023), Beltraniopsis sp. ET-17and…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…To identify the optimal incubation temperature, a wide range of temperatures (−20 °C, 0 °C, 20 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C, 40 °C, 45 °C, 50 °C, and 60 °C) was examined for both free and conjugated enzymes. The assay mixture contained 150 μL of 0.5 mM substrate (ABTS-2,2-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid), 2.7 ml of 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer of pH 4.5 and 150 μl of enzyme (at a concentration of 50 U ml −1 )/enzyme-nanoparticle conjugates and was incubated for 5 min (Sidhu et al 2017). For pH optimization, same enzyme assay method was followed with various buffers spanning a broad pH, including pH 2 Citrate phosphate buffer, pH 3 Citrate buffer, pH 4 Citrate buffer, pH 5 sodium acetate buffer, pH 6 phosphate buffer, pH 7 phosphate buffer, and pH 8 glycine NaOH buffer, offering a comprehensive assessment of enzyme activity across the pH spectrum.…”
Section: Characterization Of Synthesized Magnetic Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%