2015
DOI: 10.4172/2471-9323.1000102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isopropyl Myristate and Cocoa Butter are not Appropriate Positive Controls for Comedogenicity Assay in Asian Subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the conducted methodology was adopted from the previous studies [ 3 , 4 ], which tested on the upper aspect of the back. It was recommended that the test site should be related to the characteristics of the finished products due to the low correlation in comedogenic response of different areas [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, the conducted methodology was adopted from the previous studies [ 3 , 4 ], which tested on the upper aspect of the back. It was recommended that the test site should be related to the characteristics of the finished products due to the low correlation in comedogenic response of different areas [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, acetylated lanolin and isopropyl myristate (IPM) has been mainly used as a positive control in animal [ 10 ] and human models [ 3 ]. However, it has been suggested that IPM may not be a good positive control for comedogenicity test in human studies, particularly in Asian subjects having lower comedogenicity sensitivity than Caucasians [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations