2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.81.034309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isoscalar giant resonances in the Sn nuclei and implications for the asymmetry term in the nuclear-matter incompressibility

et al.

Abstract: We have investigated the isoscalar giant resonances in the Sn isotopes using inelastic scattering of 386-MeV α-particles at extremely forward angles, including 0 • . We have obtained completely "background-free" inelastic-scattering spectra for the Sn isotopes over the angular range 0 • -9 • and up to an excitation energy of 31.5 MeV. The strength distributions for various multipoles were extracted by a multipole decomposition analysis based on the expected angular distributions of the respective multipoles. W… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
98
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
7
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 for comparison with the experimental data. This mismatch between theoretical and experimental strengths is not too worrisome considering that the experimental strengths can have ∼20% systematic uncertainty resulting from the choice of the OMPs used and the DWBA calculations, as has been noted in previous works as well [2,32,42]. In addition to the strengths obtained for the prolate-deformed ground state, the strength distributions are obtained for a spherical configuration for comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 for comparison with the experimental data. This mismatch between theoretical and experimental strengths is not too worrisome considering that the experimental strengths can have ∼20% systematic uncertainty resulting from the choice of the OMPs used and the DWBA calculations, as has been noted in previous works as well [2,32,42]. In addition to the strengths obtained for the prolate-deformed ground state, the strength distributions are obtained for a spherical configuration for comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DWBA calculations were performed employing the "hybrid" optical-model potential (OMP) proposed by Satchler and Khoa [31]. In this procedure, the real part of the OMP is generated by single-folding with a density-dependent Gaussian α-nucleon interaction [32]. A Woods-Saxon potential is used for the imaginary term of the OMP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having computed various ground-state properties one is now in a position to compute the linear response of the mean-field ground state to a variety of probes. In the present case we are interested in computing the isoscalar monopole response as probed, for example, in α-scattering experiments [28,[45][46][47][48]. Although the MF+RPA calculations carried out here follow closely the formalism developed in much greater detail in Ref.…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two terms (κ and λ) are responsible for a softening of the equation of state of symmetric nuclear matter at normal density that results in a significant reduction of the incompressibility coefficient relative to that of the original Walecka model [41,43,44]. Indeed, such a softening is demanded by the measured distribution of isoscalar monopole strength in medium to heavy nuclei [13,21,28,[45][46][47][48][49]. Further, ω-meson self-interactions, as described by the parameter ζ , serve to soften the equation of state of symmetric nuclear matter at high densities and at present can only be meaningfully constrained by the limiting masses of neutron stars [50].…”
Section: Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where m, A and r n are the nucleon mass, the mass number, and the n th moment of the ground state density respectively, E x is the excitation energy corresponding a given state, and is given by: , respectively [13]. While the DWBA cross sections up to L = 7 were utilized in the MDA, only the L ≤ 2 strength distributions are presented in this paper since it was not possible to reliably extract meaningful strength distributions for L > 2 due to the limited experimental angular range.…”
Section: 37]mentioning
confidence: 99%