2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2009.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isotope ratio analysis of actinides, fission products, and geolocators by high-efficiency multi-collector thermal ionization mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
63
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
2
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Very briefly, when a certain heating pattern is followed, uranium ion formation efficiency as measured on the mass resolved detector of the mass spectrometer averaged 2%. This compares to a reported average in the range of 0.5% for resin beads 4 . This factor of four is significant in itself, but an even more important advantage for a high value sample is that 25% of the samples may be lost with resin beads and this loss drops to zero for PIEs.…”
Section: Uranium Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Very briefly, when a certain heating pattern is followed, uranium ion formation efficiency as measured on the mass resolved detector of the mass spectrometer averaged 2%. This compares to a reported average in the range of 0.5% for resin beads 4 . This factor of four is significant in itself, but an even more important advantage for a high value sample is that 25% of the samples may be lost with resin beads and this loss drops to zero for PIEs.…”
Section: Uranium Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The increasing threat of nuclear weapons development has prompted the use of a number of mass spectrometry techniques charged with the task of determining the isotopic composition of trace amounts of radionuclides from a diverse set of materials [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. A major focus for these types of measurements is on improving the sensitivity for the detection of uranium and transuranic isotopes in the presence of isobaric interferences without the need for complex and time-consuming sample preparation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, TIMS has profited from significant instrumental improvements on the detection side. For instance, the multiple ion counting (MIC) systems enabled to lower the minimum sample amounts required from the micro-to the low picogram range for both uranium and plutonium [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, the ionization efficiency of uranium (ratio of atoms ionized to sample atoms loaded on a filament) is relatively poor in a TIMS source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%