Metallic magnetism is both ancient and modern, occurring in such familiar settings as the lodestone in compass needles and the hard drive in computers. Surprisingly, a rigorous theoretical basis for metallic ferromagnetism is still largely missing. The Stoner approach perturbatively treats Coulomb interactions when the latter need to be large, whereas the Nagaoka approach incorporates thermodynamically negligible holes into a half-filled band. Here, we show that the ferromagnetic order of the Kondo lattice is amenable to an asymptotically exact analysis over a range of interaction parameters. In this ferromagnetic phase, the conduction electrons and local moments are strongly coupled but the Fermi surface does not enclose the latter (i.e., it is "small"). Moreover, non-Fermi-liquid behavior appears over a range of frequencies and temperatures. Our results provide the basis to understand some long-standing puzzles in the ferromagnetic heavy fermion metals, and raise the prospect for a new class of ferromagnetic quantum phase transitions.
Fermi surface | itinerant magnetism | non-Fermi liquidA contemporary theme in quantum condensed matter physics concerns competing ground states and the accompanying novel excitations (1). With a plethora of different phases, magnetic heavy fermion materials should reign supreme as the prototype for competing order. So far, most of the theoretical scrutiny has focused on antiferromagnetic heavy fermions (2, 3). Nonetheless, the list of heavy fermion metals that are known to exhibit ferromagnetic order continues to grow. An early example subjected to extensive studies is CeRu 2 Ge 2 (ref. 4 and references therein). Other ferromagnetic heavy fermion metals include CePt (5), CeSi x (6), CeAgSb 2 (7), and URu 2−x Re x Si 2 at x > 0.15 (8, 9). More recently discovered materials include CeRuPO (10) and UIr 2 Zn 20 (11). Finally, systems such as UGe 2 (12) and URhGe (13) are particularly interesting because they exhibit a superconducting dome as their metallic ferromagnetism is tuned toward its border. Some fascinating and general questions have emerged (14,15,16), yet they have hardly been addressed theoretically. One central issue concerns the nature of the Fermi surface: Is it "large," encompassing both the local moments and conduction electrons as in paramagnetic heavy fermion metals (17, 18), or is it "small," incorporating only conduction electrons? Measurements of the de Haas-van Alphen (dHvA) effect have suggested that the Fermi surface is small in CeRu 2 Ge 2 (14-16), and have provided evidence for Fermi surface reconstruction as a function of pressure in UGe 2 (19,20). At the same time, it is traditional to consider the heavy fermion ferromagnets as having a large Fermi surface when their relationship with unconventional superconductivity is discussed (12,13,21); an alternative form of the Fermi surface in the ordered state could give rise to a new type of superconductivity near its phase boundary. All these point to the importance of theoretically understanding the ferromagnet...