1997
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues concerning relative speed of processing hypotheses, schizophrenic performance deficits, and prefrontal function: Comment on Schooler et al. (1997).

Abstract: The authors have found the data presented in the C. Schooler, E. Neumann, L. J. Caplan, and B. R. Roberts (1997) article to be interesting and of potential value in constraining the further development of detailed theoretical models of Stroop performance. However, the authors have found that the relative speed of processing account of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) effects given by Schooler et al. in Experiment 1 fails to address several important and vexing issues faced by such accounts, which have been high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deficits have been attributed to a failure in cognitive-control over the inhibition of irrelevant information in WM or the selection of responses at retrieval (e.g., 1318). However, prior approaches to studying WM in SZ have employed tasks requiring multiple cognitive-control processes that are challenging to disentangle, making it difficult to determine which specific component processes are impaired (16, 1925). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deficits have been attributed to a failure in cognitive-control over the inhibition of irrelevant information in WM or the selection of responses at retrieval (e.g., 1318). However, prior approaches to studying WM in SZ have employed tasks requiring multiple cognitive-control processes that are challenging to disentangle, making it difficult to determine which specific component processes are impaired (16, 1925). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structure is involved in important brain functions such as spatial memory (e.g., Gaffan 1994; Parker and Gaffan 1997), memory retrieval (e.g., Calabrese et al, 1995), and verbal memory (e.g., Calabrese et al, 1995; Mc Mackin et al, 1995). These are also all functions disturbed in schizophrenia, including spatial memory (e.g., Park and Holzman,1992; Carter et al, 1996 and Park et al, 1999) memory retrieval (e.g., Anderson and Spellman, 1995) and verbal memory (e.g., Park and Holzman,1992; Carter et al, 1998; Cohen et al, 1997; Callicott et al, 2000; Perlstein et al, 2001). Thus characterizing disruptions in fornix integrity might further our understanding of this disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing speed and WM are integral to a variety of cognitive functions and there is mounting evidence that decrements in these two areas occur almost universally in neurologically impaired populations. For example, both WM and processing speed deficits have been noted after brain trauma (TBI) [McDowell et al,1997; Stuss et al,1985] multiple sclerosis [Demaree et al,1999; Mostofsky et al,2003; Rao et al,1989a; Rao et al,1989b], schizophrenia [Cohen et al,1997; Saykin et al,1991,1994], dementia [Bradley et al,1989; Collette et al,1999; Morris and Baddeley,1988] and normal aging [Salthouse,1992,1996; Salthouse and Coon,1993]. Moreover, processing speed has been shown to account for significant variance in the other cognitive deficits observed in clinical populations [Archibald and Fisk,2000; DeLuca et al,2004; Demaree et al,1999; Kail,1998; Li et al,2004; Litvan et al,1988].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%