2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues in the theoretical foundations of climate science

Abstract: Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The climatological reference period of 30 years is an established convention aiming at standardization and intercomparability of scientific results. However, there are no strict scientific reasons not to take 35 or 40 years (Katzav & Parker, 2018; Lovejoy & Schertzer, 2013). The choice of a specific reference period in observations can affect inferences based on the dataset such as consistency with the ensemble spread of the CMIP5, as has been shown by Hawkins and Sutton (2016).…”
Section: Understanding Dataset Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The climatological reference period of 30 years is an established convention aiming at standardization and intercomparability of scientific results. However, there are no strict scientific reasons not to take 35 or 40 years (Katzav & Parker, 2018; Lovejoy & Schertzer, 2013). The choice of a specific reference period in observations can affect inferences based on the dataset such as consistency with the ensemble spread of the CMIP5, as has been shown by Hawkins and Sutton (2016).…”
Section: Understanding Dataset Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, climate scientists may be tempted to consider the search for a more rigorous definition of little value. However, as Katzav and Parker (2018) note the theories at the foundations of climate science are not as clearly stated as one would wish for-at least from but not confined to a philosophical perspective. Katzav and Parker (2018) Katzav and Parker (2018) distinguish between statistical and combined physical-statistical descriptions.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, as Katzav and Parker (2018) note the theories at the foundations of climate science are not as clearly stated as one would wish for-at least from but not confined to a philosophical perspective. Katzav and Parker (2018) Katzav and Parker (2018) distinguish between statistical and combined physical-statistical descriptions. Additionally they highlight the partly contrasting temporal and dynamical systems perspectives on climate (compare also, e.g., Conradie, 2015).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations