2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2005.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues in ZnO homoepitaxy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One observes a significant change in the spectra obtained at low voltage with respect to the high-voltage spectra, and significant differences are observed between the samples with changes in the relative intensities of the different peaks, accounting for depth distributions of the defects responsible for the different bands. The AFRL sample shows a very low CL intensity for low-voltage acceleration beam, which evidences a severely damaged surface with very strong nonradiative recombination; for increasing acceleration voltage, the luminescence is enhanced, specially the visible band, which is progressively enhanced up to a depth around 3-4 mm, which should correspond to the region disturbed by polishing and surface chemisorption, in agreement with other reports [4]. One observes a very weak luminescence emission for AFRL sample at low kV, as compared with TD sample, which is due to the better surface preparation of TD sample; the AFRL sample should have a disordered layer close to the surface, around 0.5 mm thick, which is minimized in TD sample.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One observes a significant change in the spectra obtained at low voltage with respect to the high-voltage spectra, and significant differences are observed between the samples with changes in the relative intensities of the different peaks, accounting for depth distributions of the defects responsible for the different bands. The AFRL sample shows a very low CL intensity for low-voltage acceleration beam, which evidences a severely damaged surface with very strong nonradiative recombination; for increasing acceleration voltage, the luminescence is enhanced, specially the visible band, which is progressively enhanced up to a depth around 3-4 mm, which should correspond to the region disturbed by polishing and surface chemisorption, in agreement with other reports [4]. One observes a very weak luminescence emission for AFRL sample at low kV, as compared with TD sample, which is due to the better surface preparation of TD sample; the AFRL sample should have a disordered layer close to the surface, around 0.5 mm thick, which is minimized in TD sample.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Plates cut from the oxygen polar face of the seed (c À sector) present a much higher concentration of impurities (E5 Â À10 Â ), which makes them not suitable for UV device applications. TD sample was not analyzed by SIMS, though this material is known to present much lower impurity concentrations, around one order of magnitude below [4,5].…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations