2013
DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2013.769344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues of Disclosure and Intrusion: Ethical Challenges for a Community Researcher

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reality of the local team mixing the private and the professional removes the 'ordered' separations upon which formal ethics and scientific evidence rest. Negotiating ethical concerns in social relations requires a degree of openness and flexibility, and opportunities for local team members to articulate the complex and uncertain challenges arising from their personal encounters across the dividing line between researchers and researched Carter et al, 2013). It also needs considerable support from us (wider partners) to help them reflect on their work and their modes of engagement and to be critical listeners when trying to manage complex community dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reality of the local team mixing the private and the professional removes the 'ordered' separations upon which formal ethics and scientific evidence rest. Negotiating ethical concerns in social relations requires a degree of openness and flexibility, and opportunities for local team members to articulate the complex and uncertain challenges arising from their personal encounters across the dividing line between researchers and researched Carter et al, 2013). It also needs considerable support from us (wider partners) to help them reflect on their work and their modes of engagement and to be critical listeners when trying to manage complex community dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex ethical issues arise with CBPR particularly around the autonomy, consent and confidentiality of individuals and groups, justice in the provision of resources (Buchanan, Miller, & Wallerstein, 2007) and the potential for harm to co-researchers (Carter, Banks, Armstrong, Kindon, & Burkitt, 2013;Sunderland, Catalana, Kendall, McAuliffe, & Chenoweth, 2010). CBPR in therapy needs to be undertaken with especially careful regard for the potential for harm to all co-researchers.…”
Section: The Potential For Distressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Reciprocal sharing of personal stories is an effective way to gather rich, descriptive data, yet it can also make the researcher feel vulnerable 3 and emphasise the two-way vulnerability between the researcher and the researched. 14,25 Self-disclosure such as this is suggested to be good research practice, 26 as a way of "levelling the field" 3 and nurturing a more egalitarian interaction. At the same time, it can be argued that self-disclosure is ethically problematic on the basis that it is deceptive and exploitative of research participants.…”
Section: Participant Relationships and Unclear Relational Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this has been noted by researchers engaged in community based participatory research [12][13][14] and research with vulnerable populations. 13,15 Moreover, with emerging qualitative methodologies such as 'autoethnography' , both experienced and novice qualitative health researchers face new ethical issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation