1999
DOI: 10.1080/0968776990070105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Issues of partial credit in mathematical assessment by computer

Abstract: since 1985. From the beginning CALM has featured assessment in its programs (Beevers, Cherry, Foster and McGuire, 1991), and enabled both students and teachers to view progress in formative assessment The computer can play a role in at least four types of assessment: diagnostic, self-test, continuous and grading assessment. The TLTP project Mathwise employs the computer in three of these roles. In 1994 CALM reported on an educational experiment in which the computer was used for the first time to grade, in par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our software labs, with answers consisting of program solutions without a highly constrained specification, an automated process cannot even perform a simple test of correctness (Joy and Luck, 1998). To build a system that can provide meaningful feedback about the construction of the program is even harder (Beevers, Youngson, McGuire, Wild, and Fiddes, 1999;Thelwal, 1998). As Joy and Luck have shown (1999), simple measurements about the code, such as the number of comments, can be made but an automated process cannot perceive the more subtle aspects: choice of variable names; elegance of solution; why the code does not give a desired result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our software labs, with answers consisting of program solutions without a highly constrained specification, an automated process cannot even perform a simple test of correctness (Joy and Luck, 1998). To build a system that can provide meaningful feedback about the construction of the program is even harder (Beevers, Youngson, McGuire, Wild, and Fiddes, 1999;Thelwal, 1998). As Joy and Luck have shown (1999), simple measurements about the code, such as the number of comments, can be made but an automated process cannot perceive the more subtle aspects: choice of variable names; elegance of solution; why the code does not give a desired result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer aided assessment (CAA) for mathematics is limited only to checking a final answer for multistage questions (Livne et al, 2007;Sangwin et al, 2009;Sangwin, 2012;Beevers et al, 1999). The only solution to this problem has been to apply a partial credit method which could award marks for a partially correct portion of the solution, even if the final answer was wrong (Beevers et al, 1999;Lawson, 2012).…”
Section: Issues Of Assessing Multi-step Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only solution to this problem has been to apply a partial credit method which could award marks for a partially correct portion of the solution, even if the final answer was wrong (Beevers et al, 1999;Lawson, 2012). Many software packages for mathematical assessment have been developed, with the help of CAA software, to implement the partial credit concept.…”
Section: Issues Of Assessing Multi-step Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the pedagogical viewpoint, partial credit is very important: it enables the student who is learning -but who has not yet reached a perfect-knowledge stage -to see his or her progress; see, e.g., [1], [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%