2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00476.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

It is Time to Reduce and Safely Eliminate Restrictive Behavioural Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…; Allen et al . ; Luiselli ; Sturmey ). Due to several ethical issues (RIs conflict with certain values and ethical standards), lawfulness issues (RIs are only rendered lawful under specific conditions) and effectiveness issues (RIs can provoke additional CB, RIs can maintain CB when they function as reinforcement) issues, their use is controversial (Harris ; Luiselli ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Allen et al . ; Luiselli ; Sturmey ). Due to several ethical issues (RIs conflict with certain values and ethical standards), lawfulness issues (RIs are only rendered lawful under specific conditions) and effectiveness issues (RIs can provoke additional CB, RIs can maintain CB when they function as reinforcement) issues, their use is controversial (Harris ; Luiselli ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, several recent papers call for safely reducing RIs among persons with intellectual disabilities (e.g. Deveau & McDonnell ; Luiselli ; Sturmey ; Williams ; Williams & Grossett ). However, because these interventions are still often used in the management of CB among persons with intellectual disabilities (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7] Common risk factors are externalizing behaviour disorders, such as aggression and SIB, rather than psychiatric diagnoses. 8 Additionally, people with DDs are commonly subjected to a wide range of restrictive behaviour management practices in community and institutional settings, such as restraint, 9,10 preventable disability, and increased cost of care.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions are being raised with respect to the clinical efficacy and ethical appropriateness of such interventions (Allen, 2009;McVilly, 2009;Sturmey, 2009). In Victoria, Australia, the Senior Practitioner was established in 2007 by the Disability Act (2006) to protect the rights of people with a disability who are subjected to restrictive interventions or compulsory treatments, and who are in receipt of a disability service funded by the Department of Human Services' Disability Service.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%