2018
DOI: 10.1515/njmr-2018-0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

”It’s Difficult to be a Norwegian”: <i>Minority Voices in the Memorial Messages after the Terror Attacks in Norway 2011</i>

Abstract: The terror attacks in Norway 2011, targeting what the perpetrator described as proponents of immigration and multicultural society, created exceptional circumstances for people to reflect on issues of belonging. In this kind of situation, it is assumed that people emphasise their affinity with the affected country. This, in turn, makes the problematisation of the affinities displayed particularly interesting since the act of expressing them even in a very taxing situation indicates their importance. Texts by i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it appears these singular types of immediate commemorative monuments, which are a prominent form of social responses to terrorist attacks in western societies (Truc 2018), systematically articulate local, national and cosmopolitan expressions of grief and concern (Guisan 2009). However, so far, and strangely enough, the migrants' relationships to these memorials have been relatively neglected by those who study the social reactions to terrorist attacks, except a few exceptions (Chulilla 2005;Yocom 2006;Doving 2018;Lödén 2018;Sanchez-Carretero 2019). They have been of no more interest to the broader literature on collective and public mourning (Elliott 1999;Keard and Steinberg 1999;Walter 1999;Walter 2001;Ben Amos 2000;Fureix 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it appears these singular types of immediate commemorative monuments, which are a prominent form of social responses to terrorist attacks in western societies (Truc 2018), systematically articulate local, national and cosmopolitan expressions of grief and concern (Guisan 2009). However, so far, and strangely enough, the migrants' relationships to these memorials have been relatively neglected by those who study the social reactions to terrorist attacks, except a few exceptions (Chulilla 2005;Yocom 2006;Doving 2018;Lödén 2018;Sanchez-Carretero 2019). They have been of no more interest to the broader literature on collective and public mourning (Elliott 1999;Keard and Steinberg 1999;Walter 1999;Walter 2001;Ben Amos 2000;Fureix 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%