“…Mickwitz et al (2009, p. 60) claim that the capacities of spatial planning are shrinking due to "the rigidity of administrative and political borders, the stability of departmentalism and the strength of sectional interests and preferences for small-scale solutions". Such fragmentation in the form of "silo mentalities" and cross-sectoral mismatches in integrating critical concerns has been problematized in both planning studies (Blanco & Alberti, 2009;Healey, 2007;Isaksson & Storbjörk, 2012;Nilsson, 2007;Vigar, 2009) and adaptation studies (Glaas et al, 2010;Lidskog & Uggla, 2009;Mickwitz et al, 2009;Naess et al, 2005;Romero-Lankao, 2012;Storbjörk, 2010;Wilby & Keenan, 2012;Wilson, 2006). Fragmentation is also evident in the interplay between planning instruments, such as municipal comprehensive and local development plans (Hilding-Rydevik & Åkerskog, 2011;Measham et al, 2011;Vigar, 2009).…”