2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-009-9153-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Italian accelerometric archive: geological, geophysical and geotechnical investigations at strong-motion stations

Abstract: Geological, geophysical and geotechnical investigations, for the characterization of the strong-motion recording sites managed by the Italian Civil Protection, have been carried out in the framework of the project "Italian strong-motion database in the period 1972-2004". The project aimed at creating an updated database of strong-motion data acquired in Italy by different institutions in the time span 1972-2004, and at improving the quality of disseminated data. This article illustrates the state of the record… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The information for the RAN stations comes from different sources and was mainly collected during the Project S6 (Luzi et al 2010). Geologic 1:100,000 scale maps were made available for most of the ITACA stations, in order to have a minimum and uniform level of geologic information, since the standardization of information for all stations was one of the primary objective.…”
Section: Collection Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The information for the RAN stations comes from different sources and was mainly collected during the Project S6 (Luzi et al 2010). Geologic 1:100,000 scale maps were made available for most of the ITACA stations, in order to have a minimum and uniform level of geologic information, since the standardization of information for all stations was one of the primary objective.…”
Section: Collection Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, 7 stations that recorded the 1976 Friuli earthquake (Fontanive et al 1985) and 16 stations of the 1980 Irpinia event (Irpinia Project: Palazzo 1991a,b) have been deeply investigated by geological and geotechnical data, including laboratory and in situ tests; for the 1980 Irpinia event ENEL forms, as well as geologic maps at 1:5,000 scale with corresponding geologic cross-sections were also provided; • seismic velocity profiles obtained by using the controlled source spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW) for 18 sites that recorded the 1997-1998 Umbria Marche earthquake sequence (Kayen et al 2008); • stratigraphies, versus profiles, seismic refraction profiles and geotechnical parameters for about ten digital stations come from the Project S6 (Luzi et al 2010). …”
Section: Collection Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9 Comparison between f 0 from microtremor and from 1D modeling at accelerometric stations for which a noise measurement and an independent shear wave velocity profile down to the bedrock are available. The following geophysical tests were conducted for each station: CLF, down-hole (Di Giulio et al 2006); SELE, down-hole (Capilleri et al 2005); AQV, MASW and cross-hole (Luzi et al 2010 (Bozzano et al 2000); ARN and BGI, cross-hole (ISMES, 1992; Progetto Irpinia, Allegato 6; NERIES Project, http://www.neries-eu.org/)…”
Section: Comparison Of Hvsr Estimates and Independent Evaluations Of Fmentioning
confidence: 99%