The 2nd Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV'05)
DOI: 10.1109/crv.2005.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative Corner Extraction and Matching for Mosaic Construction

Abstract: A rapid and automatic iterative corner extraction and matching for 2D mosaic construction is presented. This new system progressively estimates the geometric transformation parameters between two misaligned images. It combines corner extraction, matching, and transformation parameters estimation into an iterative scheme. By aligning the images in successive iterations, accuracy improves significantly. The accurately aligned images are used to re-extract new features, which are subsequently matched to select co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In each of the images of Figure 1, the brightness of the images is artificially reduced, motion blur (horizontal and vertical) is added, Gaussian noise is introduced and small rotation and translation is applied. In order to explain the improvement of the proposed algorithm, the comparison is preformed over two standard algorithms for corner matching proposed by Alkaabi and Deravi [10] and Laurakis et al [14] with respect to two performance measures, precision and recall, discussed in section IIC under different conditions. The results are shown in Figure 2 (Figure 2 and 3), it is observed that when the comparison is performed normal lighting conditions, the performance of the proposed algorithm is almost similar (slightly better) compared to two other algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In each of the images of Figure 1, the brightness of the images is artificially reduced, motion blur (horizontal and vertical) is added, Gaussian noise is introduced and small rotation and translation is applied. In order to explain the improvement of the proposed algorithm, the comparison is preformed over two standard algorithms for corner matching proposed by Alkaabi and Deravi [10] and Laurakis et al [14] with respect to two performance measures, precision and recall, discussed in section IIC under different conditions. The results are shown in Figure 2 (Figure 2 and 3), it is observed that when the comparison is performed normal lighting conditions, the performance of the proposed algorithm is almost similar (slightly better) compared to two other algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lourakis et al [9] proposed a fully automatic method for matching image features between two stereo pairs which exploited geometric constraints arising from the structure of a scene. Alkaabi and Deravi [10] proposed a rapid and automatic iterative corner extraction and matching for 2D mosaic construction. The algorithm combined corner extraction, matching, and transformation parameters estimation into an iterative scheme.…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [1] present an iterative corner extraction and matching method for aligning images in two-dimensional mosaics. Peleg et.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent image mosaicing techniques attempt to deal with parallax by 1) restricting the camera motion [1], 2) using adaptive manifolds [16], 3) dividing the scene into planar sub-scenes [6], or 4) recovering dense depth maps [4,12,30,9]. Image mosaicing is especially relevant within the context of aerial imagery, where one is oftentimes faced with the challenge of visualizing and understanding the image data captured over vast areas by one or more aerial vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors compared the performance of normalized mutual information (NMI) as a window similarity measure to that of two other measures, namely normalized crosscorrelation (NCC) and sum of squared differences (SSD). Alkaabi and Deravi (2005) presented a rapid and automatic iterative corner extraction and matching for 2D mosaic construction. The algorithm combined corner extraction, matching, and transformation parameters estimation into an iterative scheme.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%