2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56608-5_65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iterative Estimation of Document Relevance Score for Pseudo-Relevance Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pseudorelevance feedback is a well-known model of automatic query expansion, and has shown improvements in the performance of retrieval. Several models for pseudorelevance feedback has been developed [2,20,[24][25][26]31].…”
Section: Semantic Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudorelevance feedback is a well-known model of automatic query expansion, and has shown improvements in the performance of retrieval. Several models for pseudorelevance feedback has been developed [2,20,[24][25][26]31].…”
Section: Semantic Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Xu & Croft (1996) confirmed in their experiments, an expansion with local feedback based on the search results of the original query is more suitable than global techniques that examine word relationships in a corpus. Therefore, the application examples in this paper use an expansion with local feedback called Pseudo Relevance Feedback (PRF), as this technique currently represents the state of the art (Ariannezhad, Montazeralghaem, Zamani, & Shakery, 2017;Keikha, Ensan, & Bagheri, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the documents used for this relevance feedback are irrelevant, the selected expansion terms impact the retrieval performance negatively [13]. Ariannezhad et al [14] proposed a new approach which consider that the documents containing more informative terms for PRF should have higher relevance scores. Moreover, an iterative algorithm is provided for ensuring the satisfaction of the proposed constraint for any PRF model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%