1999
DOI: 10.1109/60.766971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iteratively reweighted least squares for maximum likelihood identification of synchronous machine parameters from on-line tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, the covariance matrix R(θ) is recalculated, leading to an iterative reweighting of the objective function (18). The identification process can be summarized in the three following steps [32].…”
Section: ML Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, the covariance matrix R(θ) is recalculated, leading to an iterative reweighting of the objective function (18). The identification process can be summarized in the three following steps [32].…”
Section: ML Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[defined in (8)]. Here, is the set of parameters that must be identified and is given by: (12) where is the set of admissible values of the parameter.…”
Section: Identification Of Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is reduced to fit an EC structure to the measured frequency response of the machine. The maximum-likelihood (ML) estimation approach is now a well accepted method for identification of SM parameters from frequency and time-domain tests [2]- [4], [8], where the minimum of a log likelihood function [8], [9] is sought. The minimization is generally performed using techniques based on Gauss-Newton, Neder-Mead or Levenberg-Maquard approaches [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the shortcomings of the traditional methods, and, to some extent, include unstructured nonlinearities, online identification methods have been suggested [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. These papers can be divided into two categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second category [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] of papers assumes a known structure for the synchronous machine (as the traditional methods), and tries to estimate the physical parameters from on-line measurements. The main advantage of this category is that it yields the physical parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%