2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Itinerant-electron metamagnetism and susceptibility maximum behavior in several kinds of Laves-phase compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On theoretical grounds, Wohlfarth and Rhodes showed that a maximum in the temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility is expected due to the large positive curvature of the density of states and is characteristic of an IEM system [36]. Such a temperature dependence of susceptibility has indeed been observed in a number of compounds which exhibit IEM [37]. It was mentioned above that materials with negative M 4 coefficient in equation 12 exhibit IEM and FOT.…”
Section: Itinerant Electron Metamagnetism In Rco 2 Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…On theoretical grounds, Wohlfarth and Rhodes showed that a maximum in the temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility is expected due to the large positive curvature of the density of states and is characteristic of an IEM system [36]. Such a temperature dependence of susceptibility has indeed been observed in a number of compounds which exhibit IEM [37]. It was mentioned above that materials with negative M 4 coefficient in equation 12 exhibit IEM and FOT.…”
Section: Itinerant Electron Metamagnetism In Rco 2 Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In particular, the ðTÞ maximum characterizes Co 3 Mo 3 C. A broad maximum observed for the itinerant electron system reminds us of a metamagnetic transition because the ðTÞ maximum is considered to correlate closely with IEMT and has been observed for almost all enhanced Pauli paramagnetic materials showing IEMT. [18][19][20] Hence, we measured high-field magnetization for Co 3 Mo 3 X. The results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His theory worked well in explaining experimental results especially of Co based Laves phase compounds and Co(S 1Àx Se x ) pyrites. [18][19][20]24,25) We apply this relation to Co 3 Mo 3 C. Using the hyperfine coupling constant and K orb , intrinsic ðT max Þ and ð0Þ are estimated to be 8:9 Â 10 À3 and 6:5 Â 10 À3 emu/(f.u.Ámol), respectively, by extrapolating high-temperature data. With these values, ac=b 2 is estimated as 0.66 for Co 3 Mo 3 C, which is outside the upper bound 9=20 ¼ 0:45 of the criterion proposed by Yamada, suggesting that Yamada's theory is too simple to explain the IEMT of Co 3 Mo 3 C. One of possible reasons for the discordance is that the magnetic order parameter M may not be uniform in this system owing to the presence of different magnetic sites.…”
Section: -2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, crystalline YCo 2 has been investigated because of its itinerant-electron metamagnetism (IEM). 5,6 This field-driven first-order transition from the paramagnetic ground-state to a ferromagnetic state relates to a change in the band structure of 3d electrons by applying a magnetic field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%