2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis of cultivated Pseudostellaria heterophylla and its wild-type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to depurate the protein extraction and determine the final protein concentration, the 2D Clean‐up Kit (GE Healthcare, UK) and 2D Quant Kit (GE Healthcare, London, UK) were used sequentially, following the manufacturer's instructions. Proteins were digested according to the FASP method . Protein samples (100 μg) were reduced using 2 μL of reducing agent and incubated at 60 °C for 1 h. Next, added 1 μL of cysteine‐blocking reagent at room temperature for 10 min using iTRAQ Reagent Multiplex Buffer Kit (AB Sciex, USA), and then transferred for ultrafiltration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to depurate the protein extraction and determine the final protein concentration, the 2D Clean‐up Kit (GE Healthcare, UK) and 2D Quant Kit (GE Healthcare, London, UK) were used sequentially, following the manufacturer's instructions. Proteins were digested according to the FASP method . Protein samples (100 μg) were reduced using 2 μL of reducing agent and incubated at 60 °C for 1 h. Next, added 1 μL of cysteine‐blocking reagent at room temperature for 10 min using iTRAQ Reagent Multiplex Buffer Kit (AB Sciex, USA), and then transferred for ultrafiltration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elution was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 214 nm/280 nm, and fractions were collected every 1 min (Wang et al, ). The eluted peptides were pooled into 24 fractions, which were vacuum‐dried and acidized in 50% TFA for further nanoLC‐MS/MS analysis (Hua et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the acquired sample was re-suspended with 20μl of 2% carbinol, 0.1% formic acid (12,000r, 10min, RT), and 10μl of supernatant was loaded onto EASY-Spray column (12cm×75μm, C18, 3μm), and a loading pump ow rate was 350 nl/min for 15 min and a separation ow rate was 350 nl/min. The separation gradient was as follows: 0 min, 4% mobile phase B (100% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid); 5 min, 15% mobile phase B; 40 min, 25% mobile phase B; 65 min, 35% mobile phase B; 70 min, 95% mobile phase B; 82 min, 95% mobile phase B; 85 min, 4% mobile phase B; 90 min, 4% mobile phase B, as previously described [15][16][17].…”
Section: Separation Of Peptides and Lc-ms/ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%