2022
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2022.3179575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IV-PSNR—The Objective Quality Metric for Immersive Video Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An objective quality metric for assessing the quality of synthesized views for virtual reality applications is the IV-PSNR (Immersive Video -Peak Signal to Noise Ratio). 19,20 Unlike traditional PSNR metric that is commonly used for visual content assessments, this metric offers a better quality evaluation of synthesized images as it deals with two typical immersive video distortions: the pixel shift and the global component difference. IV-PSNR is an objective quality metric like PSNR calculating the difference between corresponding pixels, but in IV-PSNR a matching window with slight left/right-up/down shifts maximizes the pixel match, prior to calculating the pixels' difference, accounting for possible image shifts that may occur when synthesizing a virtual view.…”
Section: Quality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An objective quality metric for assessing the quality of synthesized views for virtual reality applications is the IV-PSNR (Immersive Video -Peak Signal to Noise Ratio). 19,20 Unlike traditional PSNR metric that is commonly used for visual content assessments, this metric offers a better quality evaluation of synthesized images as it deals with two typical immersive video distortions: the pixel shift and the global component difference. IV-PSNR is an objective quality metric like PSNR calculating the difference between corresponding pixels, but in IV-PSNR a matching window with slight left/right-up/down shifts maximizes the pixel match, prior to calculating the pixels' difference, accounting for possible image shifts that may occur when synthesizing a virtual view.…”
Section: Quality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the MIV-CTC defines the methodology to assess objective and subjective quality. Objective quality is evaluated using two full-reference quality metrics: WS-PSNR [21] and IV-PSNR [22]. These metrics measure the quality of synthesized source views by calculating BD rates [23].…”
Section: Video Coding and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the VVenC version v0.1.3.0, which is listed in the CTC, does not support subpictures, this experiment used the recent version of VVenC. The immersive video peak signal-to-noise ratio (IV-PSNR) is an end-to-end quality metric suitable for 6DoF immersive video quality assessment and which was used in this experiment [37]. A modified version of SubpicMergeApp in VTM version v11.0 conducted subpicture merging, and the modifications are explained in Section IV.…”
Section: A Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%