2007
DOI: 10.1177/0959353507079085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IV. Researching South Asian Women's Experiences of Marriage: Resisting Stereotypes through an Exploration of `Space' and `Embodiment'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Giddens (1992) has written approvingly of a general shift to intimacy, companionate marriage and equality in late modernity, but the 20 situation of Farhat and Fiyaz suggests that the expectation of intimacy is a factor in destabilising marriage. In addition to exploring specific practices such as transnational close-kin marriage, we agree with Majumdar (2007) that it is important to de-exoticize the study of British Asian marriage and kinship and explore commonalities with wider changing expectations of conjugality. Expectations of intimacy do not map straightforwardly onto a geography of modernity that contrasts the 'progressive' expectations of people born in Britain with the 'traditional' aspirations of Pakistani migrant spouses, because marital expectations are far from static in migrants' countries of origin (Parry, 2004, Ahmed, 2003, Mody, 2008, Grover, 2010, Qureshi, 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Giddens (1992) has written approvingly of a general shift to intimacy, companionate marriage and equality in late modernity, but the 20 situation of Farhat and Fiyaz suggests that the expectation of intimacy is a factor in destabilising marriage. In addition to exploring specific practices such as transnational close-kin marriage, we agree with Majumdar (2007) that it is important to de-exoticize the study of British Asian marriage and kinship and explore commonalities with wider changing expectations of conjugality. Expectations of intimacy do not map straightforwardly onto a geography of modernity that contrasts the 'progressive' expectations of people born in Britain with the 'traditional' aspirations of Pakistani migrant spouses, because marital expectations are far from static in migrants' countries of origin (Parry, 2004, Ahmed, 2003, Mody, 2008, Grover, 2010, Qureshi, 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Studies of divorce acknowledge the paucity of empirical research on ethnic minority experiences (Simpson, 1998, Smart and Neale, 1999, 2001). There have been moves to theorize marital breakdown and divorce beyond the fragmentation and separation implied by the 'individualization' thesis by developing theories of 'connectedness' emphasizing the relational, emotional and intimate dimensions of marriage that mean so much to its actual 3 experience (Smart, 2007: 189), but the diversity of intimate relationships among migrants and minorities has not been appreciated (Jamieson, 2011, Majumdar, 2007, Mai and King, 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that, because of the broader disapproval of divorce, domestic abuse was one of the few situations in which women would insist on divorce (Hassouneh-Philips 2001;Thiara et al 2010;Chaudhuri et al 2014). However, divorces in South Asian diasporas are underpinned not only by situations of domestic abuse, but also by marital expectations that have been shown to be not static and monolithic but local, intersectionally-inflected 'cultural scripts' (Mehrotra 2016), entailing agential, embodied experiences of sexuality and reproduction (Majumdar 2007) and a certain degree of acceptance of a growing individualisation in relationship-making (Ahmad 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locating early marriage as a problem that violates universal rights strips away the context that renders early marriage a comprehensible familial and cultural practice, within a particular set of social circumstances. This enables the reproduction of a more general representation of the Muslim girl (and particularly the African Muslim girl) as racialised, classed and gendered Other, the abjected feminine – an essential victim, silent, passive, always-already requiring rescue (Ahmed, Reavey, & Majumdar, 2009; Majumdar, 2007). This underestimates women’s ability to resist cultural practices without the rescuing activity of external agencies, and undermines the potential effectiveness of local community organizing around women’s issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables the reproduction of a more general representation of the Muslim girl (and particularly the African Muslim girl) as racialised, classed and gendered Other, the abjected feminine -an essential victim, silent, passive, always-already requiring rescue (Ahmed, Reavey, & Majumdar, 2009;Majumdar, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%