2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/798/2/99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IZI: INFERRING THE GAS PHASE METALLICITY (Z) AND IONIZATION PARAMETER (q) OF IONIZED NEBULAE USING BAYESIAN STATISTICS

Abstract: We present a new method for inferring the metallicity (Z) and ionization parameter (q) of HII regions and star-forming galaxies using strong nebular emission lines (SEL). We use Bayesian inference to derive the joint and marginalized posterior probability density functions for Z and q given a set of observed line fluxes and an input photo-ionization model. Our approach allows the use of arbitrary sets of SELs and the inclusion of flux upper limits. The method provides a self-consistent way of determining the p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
197
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
8
197
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical direct-method calibrations may be biased towards lower metallicities due to the presence of temperature gradients and inhomogeneities within the ionized gas (Stasińska 2005;Bresolin 2007), although this problem primarily affects high-metallicity, low-temperature H ii regions. Direct-method metallicities may indeed have a normalization bias, but have been shown to tightly correlate with metallicities determined from oxygen recombination lines with a slope of unity (Blanc et al 2015) and an offset of ∼ −0.2 dex. For photoionization models, it is difficult to determine the proper combination of input parameters and physical conditions that produce realistic H ii regions because of degeneracies among parameters.…”
Section: Application To the Z ∼ 0 Mzr And Fmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Empirical direct-method calibrations may be biased towards lower metallicities due to the presence of temperature gradients and inhomogeneities within the ionized gas (Stasińska 2005;Bresolin 2007), although this problem primarily affects high-metallicity, low-temperature H ii regions. Direct-method metallicities may indeed have a normalization bias, but have been shown to tightly correlate with metallicities determined from oxygen recombination lines with a slope of unity (Blanc et al 2015) and an offset of ∼ −0.2 dex. For photoionization models, it is difficult to determine the proper combination of input parameters and physical conditions that produce realistic H ii regions because of degeneracies among parameters.…”
Section: Application To the Z ∼ 0 Mzr And Fmrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is the most accurate method of metallicity determina-tion that can be applied to reasonably large samples (N > 100) of low-redshift galaxies. The utility of the direct-method has been demonstrated by the observation that direct-method metallicities tightly correlate with metallicities obtained from oxygen recombination lines that more directly measure the oxygen abundance, where the relation has a slope of unity but an offset of ∼ 0.2 dex from a one-to-one relation (Blanc et al 2015). Metal recombination lines are ∼ 10 4 times weaker than strong lines and thus are not a practical metallicity indicator for any large sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong-line method of Blanc et al (2015; IZI hereafter) cannot be applied to DIG to get an accurate metallicity because it currently contains only H ii region models which fail to describe the DIG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metallicities derived using N2O2 are optimal because they exhibit the smallest bias and error. Using O3N2, R 23 , N2=[N ii]/Hα, and N2S2Hα (Dopita et al 2016) to derive metallicities introduces bias in the derived metallicity gradients as large as the gradient itself.The strong-line method of Blanc et al (2015; IZI hereafter) cannot be applied to DIG to get an accurate metallicity because it currently contains only H ii region models which fail to describe the DIG. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a stacking analysis of galaxies between 0.2 < z < 0.6 from the SHELS galaxy redshift survey, Kewley et al (2015) have studied We measure the gas phase metallicity (Z) and ionization parameter (q) of the ionized nebula using the izi (Inferring metallicity and ionization parameters) code described in Blanc et al (2015) and assuming the photoionization model results of Levesque et al (2010). The Z and q for the three z bins are listed in column 5 and 6 of Table 4.…”
Section: [O Iii]/[o Ii] and [O Iii]/hβ Nebular Line Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%