1998
DOI: 10.1017/s0048577298000857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences

Abstract: A new method based on jackknifing is presented for measuring the difference between two conditions in the onset latencies of the lateralized readiness potential (LRP). The method can be used with both stimulus- and response-locked LRPs, and simulations indicate that it provides accurate estimates of onset latency differences in many common experimental conditions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
194
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
194
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N2pc onset latencies were measured on the basis of difference waveforms obtained by subtracting ipsilateral from contralateral ERPs at PO7/8. Onset latencies were determined with a jackknife-based procedure (Miller, Patterson, & Ulrich, 1998;Ulrich & Miller, 2001). Sixteen grand-average difference waves were computed for each experimental condition (horizontal target in the first or second display in single-or dualtarget trials), each excluding one different participant from the original sample.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…N2pc onset latencies were measured on the basis of difference waveforms obtained by subtracting ipsilateral from contralateral ERPs at PO7/8. Onset latencies were determined with a jackknife-based procedure (Miller, Patterson, & Ulrich, 1998;Ulrich & Miller, 2001). Sixteen grand-average difference waves were computed for each experimental condition (horizontal target in the first or second display in single-or dualtarget trials), each excluding one different participant from the original sample.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This absolute threshold was defined as 50% of the peak amplitude of the smallest N2pc component in any of the trial conditions (the N2pc for H1 dual-target trials; see Figure 2). F-and t-values of the statistical comparisons were corrected according to the formulas described by Ulrich and Miller (2001) and Miller et al (1998), respectively. The corrected values are indicated with the labels 'F c ' and 't c '.…”
Section: Eeg Recording and Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a. We used the time when the waveform reached 50 % of the peak amplitude as a measure of the onset of stimulus-locked LRPs (Miller et al 1998). The mean amplitude was measured in the time window of 150-250 ms for the positive-going Gratton-dip and 200-300 ms (congruent condition) and 350-450 ms (incongruent condition) for the following negative-going deflections.…”
Section: Ride-reconstructed S-lrpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A jackknife-based scoring method with a relative criterion of 50% of the peak LRP amplitude was chosen for measuring S-LRP and LRP-R onset latencies, respectively (cf., Miller et al 1998). This scoring technique has been developed to increase the low signal-to-noise ratio commonly observed with LRP data before onset detection.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. As the applied jackknife procedure strongly reduces SEM, obtained t values and SEM were corrected according to a procedure described by Miller et al (1998). Pergolide markedly decreased S-LRP latencies compared to placebo [t(11)=6.5, p<0.001]; S-LRP latencies were 289 and 332 ms under pergolide and placebo, respectively.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%